Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scene Classification Based on the Multifeature Fusion Probabilistic Topic Model for High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery

Zhong, Yanfei, Zhu, Qiqi, Zhang, Liangpei·2015·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Scene classification has been proved to be an effective method for high spatial resolution (HSR) remote sensing image semantic interpretation. The probabilistic topic model (PTM) has been successfully applied to natural scenes by utilizing a single feature (e.g., the spectral feature); however, it is inadequate for HSR images due to the complex structure of the land-cover classes. Although several studies have investigated techniques that combine multiple features, the different features are usually quantized after simple concatenation (CAT-PTM). Unfortunately, due to the inadequate fusion capacity of k-means clustering, the words of the visual dictionary obtained by CAT-PTM are highly correlated. In this paper, a semantic allocation level (SAL) multifeature fusion strategy based on PTM, namely, SAL-PTM (SAL-pLSA and SAL-LDA) for HSR imagery is proposed. In SAL-PTM: 1) the complementary spectral, texture, and scale-invariant-featuretransform features are effectively combined; 2) the three features are extracted and quantized separately by k-means clustering, which can provide appropriate low-level feature descriptions for the semantic representations; and 3)the latent semantic allocations of the three features are captured separately by PTM, which follows the core idea of PTM-based scene classification. The probabilistic latent semantic analysis (pLSA) and latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) models were compared to test the effect of different PTMs for HSR imagery. A U.S. Geological Survey data set and the UC Merced data set were utilized to evaluate SAL-PTM in comparison with the conventional methods. The experimental results confirmed that SAL-PTM is superior to the single-feature methods and CAT-PTM in the scene classification of HSR imagery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2015.2435801

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Zhong, Y., Zhu, Q., & Zhang, L.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2015-11
Volume
53
Issue
11
Pages
6207-6222
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W1526295910
Cited by
244
References
6
FWCI
47.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scene Classification Based on the Multifeature Fusion Probabilistic Topic Model for High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2015.2435801
The paper
Zhong, Y., Zhu, Q., & Zhang, L. (2015). Scene Classification Based on the Multifeature Fusion Probabilistic Topic Model for High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2015.2435801

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.