The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BockNet: Blind-Block Reconstruction Network With a Guard Window for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Abstract
Hyperspectral anomaly detection (HAD) aims to identify anomalous targets that deviate from the surrounding background in unlabeled hyperspectral images (HSIs). Most existing deep networks that exploit reconstruction errors to detect anomalies are prone to fit anomalous pixels, thus yielding small reconstruction errors for anomalies, which is not favorable for separating targets from HSIs. In order to achieve a superior background reconstruction network for HAD purposes, this paper proposes a self-supervised blind-block network (termed BockNet) with a guard window. BockNet creates a blind-block (guard window) in the center of the network’s receptive field, rendering it unable to see the information inside the guard window when reconstructing the central pixel. This process seamlessly embeds a sliding dual-window model into our BockNet, in which the inner window is the guard window and the outer window is the receptive field outside the guard window. Naturally, BockNet utilizes only the outer window information to predict/reconstruct the central pixel of the perceptive field. During the reconstruction of pixels inside anomalous targets of varying sizes, the targets typically fall into the guard window, weakening the contribution of anomalies to the reconstruction results so that those reconstructed pixels converge to the background distribution of the outer window area. Accordingly, the reconstructed HSI can be deemed as a pure background HSI, and the reconstruction error of anomalous pixels will be further enlarged, thus improving the discrimination ability of the BockNet model for anomalies. Extensive experiments on four datasets illustrate the competitive and satisfactory performance of our BockNet compared to other state-of-the-art detectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution
Reed, I. S., & Yu, X. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.60107 · Cited by 1,867
Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Luo, W., Li, Y., Urtasun, R., & Zemel, R. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.04128 · Cited by 1,575
Noise2Void - Learning Denoising From Single Noisy Images
Krull, A., Buchholz, T.-O., & Jug, F. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00223 · Cited by 1,366
Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection
Li, W., & Du, Q. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2343955 · Cited by 758
Deep learning in multimodal remote sensing data fusion: A comprehensive review
Li, J., Hong, D., Gao, L., Yao, J., Zheng, K., Zhang, B., & Chanussot, J. (2022) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102926 · Cited by 630
Self-citationAnomaly Detection in Hyperspectral Images Based on Low-Rank and Sparse Representation
Xu, Y., Wu, Z., Li, J., Plaza, A., & Wei, Z. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2493201 · Cited by 602
Self-citationZhang, Y., Du, B., Zhang, L., & Wang, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2479299 · Cited by 485
Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection With Attribute and Edge-Preserving Filters
Kang, X., Zhang, X., Li, S., Li, K., Li, J., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2710145 · Cited by 469
Progress and Challenges in Intelligent Remote Sensing Satellite Systems
Zhang, B., Wu, Y., Zhao, B., Chanussot, J., Hong, D., Yao, J., & Gao, L. (2022) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2022.3148139 · Cited by 437
Self-citationSelf-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, advances, and challenges
Ericsson, L., Gouk, H., Loy, C. C., & Hospedales, T. M. (2022) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2021.3134634 · Cited by 433
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, D., Zhuang, L., Gao, L., Sun, X., Huang, M., & Plaza, A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W4389104899
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 63.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BockNet: Blind-Block Reconstruction Network With a Guard Window for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2023.3335484
- The paper
- Wang, D., Zhuang, L., Gao, L., Sun, X., Huang, M., & Plaza, A. (2023). BockNet: Blind-Block Reconstruction Network With a Guard Window for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2023.3335484
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.