PreprintCited by 1,575Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

Open access
Luo, Wenjie, Li, Yujia, Urtasun, Raquel, Zemel, Richard·2017·arXiv

Abstract

We study characteristics of receptive fields of units in deep convolutional networks. The receptive field size is a crucial issue in many visual tasks, as the output must respond to large enough areas in the image to capture information about large objects. We introduce the notion of an effective receptive field, and show that it both has a Gaussian distribution and only occupies a fraction of the full theoretical receptive field. We analyze the effective receptive field in several architecture designs, and the effect of nonlinear activations, dropout, sub-sampling and skip connections on it. This leads to suggestions for ways to address its tendency to be too small.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1701.04128

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work on effective receptive fields and salient regions reveals that only a small proportion of pixels in the theoretical receptive field contribute significantly to the final network prediction.

    “Recent works on effective receptive fields [31] and salient regions [41, 44, 13, 7] reveal that only a small proportion of pixels in the theoretical receptive field contribute significantly to the final network prediction.”

    From Deformable ConvNets V2: More Deformable, Better Results (2019) · cites this paper as [31]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, W., Li, Y., Urtasun, R., & Zemel, R.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
Volume
29
Pages
4898-4906
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2556967412
Cited by
1,575
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 278 · 2023: 290 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 228 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 125 · 2018: 75 · 2017: 20
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
effective receptive field, receptive field size, deep convolutional neural networks, nonlinear activation functions, dropout, subsampling, skip connections, network architecture design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review