Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 323

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

RS-Mamba for Large Remote Sensing Image Dense Prediction

Open access
Zhao, Sijie, Chen, Hao, Zhang, Xueliang, Xiao, Pengfeng, Bai, Lei, Ouyang, Wanli·2024·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Context modeling is critical for remote sensing image dense prediction tasks. Nowadays, the growing size of very-high-resolution (VHR) remote sensing images poses challenges in effectively modeling context. While transformer-based models possess global modeling capabilities, they encounter computational challenges when applied to large VHR images due to their quadratic complexity. The conventional practice of cropping large images into smaller patches results in a notable loss of contextual information. To address these issues, we propose the remote sensing Mamba (RSM) for dense prediction tasks in large VHR remote sensing images. RSM is specifically designed to capture the global context of remote sensing images with linear complexity, facilitating the effective processing of large VHR images. Considering that the land covers in remote sensing images are distributed in arbitrary spatial directions due to characteristics of remote sensing over-head imaging, the RSM incorporates an omnidirectional selective scan module (OSSM) to globally model the context of images in multiple directions, capturing large spatial features from various directions. We designed simple yet effective models based on RSM, achieving state-of-the-art performance on dense prediction tasks in VHR remote sensing images without fancy training strategies. Extensive experiments on semantic segmentation (SS) and change detection (CD) tasks across various land covers demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RSM. Leveraging the linear complexity and global modeling capabilities, RSM achieves better efficiency and accuracy than transformer-based models on large remote sensing images. Interestingly, we also demonstrated that our model generally performs better with a larger image size on dense prediction tasks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2024.3425540

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, S., Chen, H., Zhang, X., Xiao, P., Bai, L., & Ouyang, W.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2024
Volume
62
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W4400448280
Cited by
323
References
59
FWCI
54.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RS-Mamba for Large Remote Sensing Image Dense Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2024.3425540
The paper
Zhao, S., Chen, H., Zhang, X., Xiao, P., Bai, L., & Ouyang, W. (2024). RS-Mamba for Large Remote Sensing Image Dense Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2024.3425540

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.