Cited by 16,438Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Pyramid Scene Parsing Network

Zhao, Hengshuang, Shi, Jianping, Qi, Xiaojuan, Wang, Xiaogang, Jia, Jiaya·2017·2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Scene parsing is challenging for unrestricted open vocabulary and diverse scenes. In this paper, we exploit the capability of global context information by different-region-based context aggregation through our pyramid pooling module together with the proposed pyramid scene parsing network (PSPNet). Our global prior representation is effective to produce good quality results on the scene parsing task, while PSPNet provides a superior framework for pixel-level prediction. The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on various datasets. It came first in ImageNet scene parsing challenge 2016, PASCAL VOC 2012 benchmark and Cityscapes benchmark. A single PSPNet yields the new record of mIoU accuracy 85.4% on PASCAL VOC 2012 and accuracy 80.2% on Cityscapes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2017.660

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multi-scale features have shown superior performance in detecting objects with different grains.

    “Multi-scale features have shown superior performance in detecting objects with different grains [35].”
  • Ternary quantization and multivariate quantization are harnessed to strike a proper balance between model size and accuracy.

    “Hence, ternary quantization and multivariate quantization are harnessed to strike a proper balance between model size and accuracy.”
  • Virtually all existing architectures for dense prediction are based on convolutional networks.

    “Virtually all existing architectures for dense prediction are based on convolutional networks [6,31,34,42,49,50,53].”

    From Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

  • Using the feature map up-sampled only once with a down-sampling rate of 16 (P4), FPN reaches mIoU and P.A. of 34.46/76.04, almost identical to the strong baseline reference reported in [16] while only taking about 1/3 of the training time for the same number of iterations.

    “Using the feature map up-sampled only once with a down-sampling rate of 16 ( P 4 ), it reaches mIoU and P.A. of 34 . 46 / 76 . 04, almost identical to the strong baseline reference reported in [16] while only taking about 1 / 3 of the training time for the same number of iterations.”

    From Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding (2018) · cites this paper as [16]

  • The Pyramid Pooling Module is highly compatible with the FPN architecture by bringing effective global prior representations.

    “Empirically we find that the PPM is highly compatible with the FPN architecture by bringing effective global prior representations.”

    From Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding (2018) · cites this paper as [16]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 16,438

Authors
Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., & Jia, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Sensetime (China) (CN)
Venue
2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-07
Pages
6230-6239
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2560023338
Cited by
16,438
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1150 · 2025: 2259 · 2024: 2727 · 2023: 2671 · 2022: 2295 · 2021: 2118 · 2020: 1466 · 2019: 1131 · 2018: 523 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
252.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
scene parsing, semantic segmentation, pyramid pooling, global context aggregation, pixel-level prediction, open vocabulary, Pascal VOC 2012, cityscape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review