Pyramid Scene Parsing Network
Abstract
Scene parsing is challenging for unrestricted open vocabulary and diverse scenes. In this paper, we exploit the capability of global context information by different-region-based context aggregation through our pyramid pooling module together with the proposed pyramid scene parsing network (PSPNet). Our global prior representation is effective to produce good quality results on the scene parsing task, while PSPNet provides a superior framework for pixel-level prediction. The proposed approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on various datasets. It came first in ImageNet scene parsing challenge 2016, PASCAL VOC 2012 benchmark and Cityscapes benchmark. A single PSPNet yields the new record of mIoU accuracy 85.4% on PASCAL VOC 2012 and accuracy 80.2% on Cityscapes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multi-scale features have shown superior performance in detecting objects with different grains.
“Multi-scale features have shown superior performance in detecting objects with different grains [35].”
From DilatedFormer: dilated granularity transformer network for placental maturity grading in ultrasound (2023) · cites this paper as [35]
Ternary quantization and multivariate quantization are harnessed to strike a proper balance between model size and accuracy.
“Hence, ternary quantization and multivariate quantization are harnessed to strike a proper balance between model size and accuracy.”
From A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [165]
Virtually all existing architectures for dense prediction are based on convolutional networks.
“Virtually all existing architectures for dense prediction are based on convolutional networks [6,31,34,42,49,50,53].”
From Vision Transformers for Dense Prediction (2021) · cites this paper as [53]
Using the feature map up-sampled only once with a down-sampling rate of 16 (P4), FPN reaches mIoU and P.A. of 34.46/76.04, almost identical to the strong baseline reference reported in [16] while only taking about 1/3 of the training time for the same number of iterations.
“Using the feature map up-sampled only once with a down-sampling rate of 16 ( P 4 ), it reaches mIoU and P.A. of 34 . 46 / 76 . 04, almost identical to the strong baseline reference reported in [16] while only taking about 1 / 3 of the training time for the same number of iterations.”
From Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
The Pyramid Pooling Module is highly compatible with the FPN architecture by bringing effective global prior representations.
“Empirically we find that the PPM is highly compatible with the FPN architecture by bringing effective global prior representations.”
From Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
When trained only on object supervision, UPerNet yields almost identical performance to state-of-the-art PSPNet while requiring only 63% of training time for the same number of epochs.
“When only trained on object supervision, without further enhancements, our framework yields almost identical performance as the state-of-the-art PSPNet, while requiring only 63% of training time for the same number of epochs.”
From Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
Batch size is important to generate accurate statistics for tasks like classification, semantic segmentation, and object detection.
“It is worth noting that batch size has proven to be important to generate accurate statistics for tasks like classification [38], semantic segmentation [16] and object detection [39].”
From Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understanding (2018) · cites this paper as [16]
None of the existing remedies (large kernel sizes, atrous convolutions, image/feature pyramids, attention modules, decomposed attention) can fully eliminate the limitation of FCN architecture in receptive field.
“Nonetheless, none of these can fully eliminate the limitation of FCN architecture in receptive field.”
From Vision Transformers: From Semantic Segmentation to Dense Prediction (2024) · cites this paper as Zhao et al. (2017)
CGNet M3N21's category-wise accuracy is 5.4% less than PSPNet and 5.5% less than DenseASPP.
“while its category-wise accuracy is only 5.4% and 5.5% less respectively.”
From CGNet: A Light-Weight Context Guided Network for Semantic Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
CGNet contains 51 convolutional layers with channel numbers 32, 64, and 128, making it a light-weight neural network.
“CGNet only contains 51 layers, and the number of channels in the three stages is 32, 64, 128, respectively.”
From CGNet: A Light-Weight Context Guided Network for Semantic Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
CGNet M3N21 is 131 times smaller than PSPNet and 57 times smaller than DenseASPP.
“CGNet M3N21 is 131 and 57 times smaller than PSPNet [44] and DenseASPP [34]”
From CGNet: A Light-Weight Context Guided Network for Semantic Segmentation (2021) · cites this paper as [44]
FPGAs show great improvements in both performance and power consumption in deep learning applications.
“AField-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is another viable solution, showing great improvements in both performance and power consumption in deep learning applications.”
From A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving (2020) · cites this paper as [172]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 16,438
- Authors
- Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X., & Jia, J.
- Affiliations
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Sensetime (China) (CN)
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-07
- Pages
- 6230-6239
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2560023338
- Cited by
- 16,438
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1150 · 2025: 2259 · 2024: 2727 · 2023: 2671 · 2022: 2295 · 2021: 2118 · 2020: 1466 · 2019: 1131 · 2018: 523 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 252.20
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- scene parsing, semantic segmentation, pyramid pooling, global context aggregation, pixel-level prediction, open vocabulary, Pascal VOC 2012, cityscape
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review