The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Charging Strategy for PV-Based Battery Switch Stations Considering Service Availability and Self-Consumption of PV Energy
Abstract
The photovoltaic (PV)-based battery switch station (BSS) is one of typical integration systems to implement a solar-to-vehicle system. The charging strategy is important for the operation of the PV-based BSS. Generally, instant charging strategy for swapped electric vehicle (EV) batteries can keep the availability of battery-swapping service at a high level. However, it is always accompanied with the possibility of bringing a negative effect on the utilization of PV energy. The contribution of this paper is mainly on a novel charging strategy for the PV-based BSS considering the service availability and self-consumption of the PV energy. First, considering the features of the PV-based BSS, evaluation indexes for the operation performance are defined, including the availability of battery-swapping service, self-consumption of the PV energy, and operation profit. Second, the charging strategy is proposed, including a battery-swapping service model and a power distribution model. In order to guarantee the service availability, the battery-swapping service model is used to decide the lower limit of charging power based on short-term forecasting results of EV requirements. The power distribution model is obliged to dispatch the charging power supplied by the PV system and power grid. Finally, in the case study, the operation of the BSS is simulated with the instant charging strategy and the proposed strategy under different scenarios. From the analysis of results, the proposed strategy can effectively improve the self-consumption of PV energy with the premise of guaranteeing the availability of the battery-swapping service.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electric vehicle charging in an office building microgrid with distributed energy resources
Van Roy, J., Leemput, N., Geth, F., Buscher, J., Salenbien, R., & Driesen, J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1109/tste.2014.2314754 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Energy-Sharing Model With Price-Based Demand Response for Microgrids of Peer-to-Peer Prosumers
Liu, N., Yu, X., Wang, C., Li, C., Ma, L., & Lei, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2649558 · Cited by 855
Self-citationEnergy Sharing Management for Microgrids With PV Prosumers: A Stackelberg Game Approach
Liu, N., Yu, X., Wang, C., & Wang, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2654302 · Cited by 425
Self-citationAdu-Gyamfi, G., Song, H., Asamoah, A. N., Li, L., Nketiah, E., Obuobi, B., Adjei, M., & Cudjoe, D. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121995 · Cited by 61
Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), & Mateen, S. (2022) · CPSS Transactions on Power Electronics and Applications · doi:10.24295/cpsstpea.2022.00020 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, N., Chen, Q., Lu, X., Liu, J., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4878-4889
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2039079854
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Charging Strategy for PV-Based Battery Switch Stations Considering Service Availability and Self-Consumption of PV Energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2015.2404316
- The paper
- Liu, N., Chen, Q., Lu, X., Liu, J., & Zhang, J. (2015). A Charging Strategy for PV-Based Battery Switch Stations Considering Service Availability and Self-Consumption of PV Energy. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2015.2404316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
