The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance-Driven Distributed PCA Process Monitoring Based on Fault-Relevant Variable Selection and Bayesian Inference
Abstract
Multivariate statistical process monitoring involves dimension reduction and latent feature extraction in large-scale processes and typically incorporates all measured variables. However, involving variables without beneficial information may degrade monitoring performance. This study analyzes the effect of variable selection on principal component analysis (PCA) monitoring performance. Then, it proposes a fault-relevant variable selection and Bayesian inference-based distributed method for efficient fault detection and isolation. First, the optimal subset of variables is identified for each fault using an optimization algorithm. Second, a sub-PCA model is established in each subset. Finally, the monitoring results of all of the subsets are combined through Bayesian inference. The proposed method reduces redundancy and complexity, explores numerous local behaviors, and provides accurate description of faults, thus improving monitoring performance significantly. Case studies on a numerical example, the Tennessee Eastman benchmark process, and an industrial-scale plant demonstrate the efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldberg, D. E., & Shakespeare, W. (2002) · Cited by 16,088
Holland, J. H. (1992) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66 · Cited by 5,764
A plant-wide industrial process control problem
Downs, J. J., & Vogel, E. F. (1993) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/0098-1354(93)80018-i · Cited by 3,348
A Review on Basic Data-Driven Approaches for Industrial Process Monitoring
Yin, S., Ding, S. X., Xie, X., & Luo, H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2301773 · Cited by 1,716
Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond
Joe Qin, S. (2003) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/cem.800 · Cited by 1,582
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Braatz, L. H. C. (2001) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/12/10/706 · Cited by 1,416
Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems
Chiang, L. H., Russell, E. L., & Braatz, R. D. (2001) · Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0347-9 · Cited by 1,318
Data-based techniques focused on modern industry: An overview
Yin, S., Li, X., Gao, H., & Kaynak, O. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2308133 · Cited by 1,025
Process monitoring and diagnosis by multiblock PLS methods
MacGregor, J. F., Jaeckle, C., Kiparissides, C., & Koutoudi, M. (1994) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.690400509 · Cited by 773
Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models
Westerhuis, J. A., Kourti, T., & MacGregor, J. F. (1998) · Journal of Chemometrics · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199809/10)12:5<301::aid-cem515>3.0.co;2-s · Cited by 735
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Q., Yan, X., & Huang, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 377-386
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2201427885
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 23.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance-Driven Distributed PCA Process Monitoring Based on Fault-Relevant Variable Selection and Bayesian Inference. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2015.2466557
- The paper
- Jiang, Q., Yan, X., & Huang, B. (2016). Performance-Driven Distributed PCA Process Monitoring Based on Fault-Relevant Variable Selection and Bayesian Inference. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2015.2466557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.