The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Robust Analytic Design of Power-Synchronization Control
Open accessAbstract
This paper addresses robust design of the active-power and dc-link control loops of power-synchronization control. Robustness is obtained by analytic gain selections, which give large enough stability margins. The proposed design allows robust stability irrespective of the grid strength and of the operating point, the latter with one exception. The proposed design is compared to design based on the principle virtual synchronous machine. Experiments show that the time-domain results correlate well with the frequency-domain results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 225
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2332179 · DOI
- 10.1109/TEC.2016.2533630 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2515504 · DOI
- 10.1049/cp.2016.0433 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2016.2543181 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2273979 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2465852 · DOI
- middleton, 1994, Digital Control and Estimation A Unified Approach
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2295261 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2008.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2010.2048839 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2032231 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2258684 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2085052 · DOI
- 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2017.0015 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2015.2468600 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2047875 · DOI
- 10.1109/EPQU.2007.4424220 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2017.2773643 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIE.2016.2638810 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0049 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0557 · DOI
- 10.1109/PTC.2009.5282048 · DOI
- 10.1109/PSCC.2016.7540926 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Harnefors, L., Hinkkanen, M., Riaz, U., Rahman, F. M. M., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- ABB (Sweden) (SE)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 5810-5819
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2897459764
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 6.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.aalto.fi
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Aaltodoc (Aalto University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- ABB
- Finnish Foundation for Technology Promotion
- Walter Ahlström Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
- Keywords
- power synchronization control, robust controller design, active power control, DC link control, stability margin, grid strength, virtual synchronous generator, grid-connected converters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
