The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Tuning of Active Disturbance Rejection Controller for FOPTD Model With Application to Power Plant Control
Abstract
Active disturbance rejection controller (ADRC) has achieved soaring success in motion controls featured by rapid dynamics. However, it turns obstreperous to implement it in the power plant process with considerable time-delay, largely because of the tuning difficulty. To this end, this article proposes a quantitative tuning rule for the time-delayed ADRC (TD-ADRC) structure based on the typical first order plus time delay (FOPTD) model. By compensating the FOPTD process as an integrator plus time delay in low frequencies, the gain parameter of TD-ADRC can be related to a scaled time constant which shapes the closed-loop tracking performance. Bandwidth parameter of extended state observer is scaled as a dimensionless parameter. A sufficient stability condition of TD-ADRC is theoretically derived in terms of the scaled parameter pair, the range of which falls within the practical interest. Relative delay margin is revealed as a critical robustness metric among others, a default pair of scaled parameter setting is recommended as well as an explicit retuning guideline according to the user's preference for performance or robustness. Simulation and laboratory water tank experiment validate the tuning efficacy and a coal mill temperature control test depicts a promising prospective of the proposed method in process control practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, to mitigate the effects of different types of uncertainties acting on a concerned system, the ESO component has been amended over time to accommodate the ADRC operation in industrial applications; for example, in robotic systems [10], power plants [11], teleoperation systems [12], and piezoelectric-related medical fields [13].”
From A comparative study on time-delay estimation for time-delay nonlinear system control (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Citations
Cites
From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control
Han, J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2008.2011621 · Cited by 6,803
Multivariable Feedback Control: Analysis and Design
Skogestad, S., & Postlethwaite, I. (1996) · Cited by 6,312
Computer controlled systems theory and design
Johnson, C. R. (1986) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(86)90095-6 · Cited by 3,012
Scaling and bandwidth-parameterization based controller tuning
Gao, Z. (2005) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.1109/acc.2003.1242516 · Cited by 2,453
Computer-controlled systems: Theory and design
Johnson, C. R. (1985) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/0005-1098(85)90050-0 · Cited by 2,367
Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning
Skogestad, S. (2002) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/s0959-1524(02)00062-8 · Cited by 2,040
Feedback systems: an introduction for scientists and engineers
Åström, K. J., & Murray, R. M. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2107 · Cited by 1,968
Handbook of Pi and Pid Controller Tuning Rules
O’Dwyer, A. (2006) · IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks · doi:10.1142/9781860949104 · Cited by 1,015
Model predictive control: Review of the three decades of development
Lee, J. H. (2011) · International Journal of Control Automation and Systems · doi:10.1007/s12555-011-0300-6 · Cited by 643
Åström, K. J., & Murray, R. M. (2010) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4gdk · Cited by 493
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- strm, 2006, Advanced PID Control
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114381 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Active disturbance rejection control for robotic systems: A review
Fareh, R., Khadraoui, S., Abdallah, M. Y., Baziyad, M., & Bettayeb, M. (2021) · Mechatronics · doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2021.102671 · Cited by 192
Du, Y., Cao, W., & She, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3153821 · Cited by 146
Wang, Y., Fang, S., & Hu, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2022.3206089 · Cited by 125
Wu, Z., Li, D., Liu, Y., & Chen, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3192687 · Cited by 81
Self-citationA Generalized PID Interpretation for High-Order LADRC and Cascade LADRC for Servo Systems
Lin, P., Wu, Z. Y., Fei, Z., & Sun, X. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2021.3082058 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, L., Xue, W., Li, D., Zhu, H., & Su, Z.-G.
- Affiliations
- Southeast University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Nanjing Institute of Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 805-815
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W3122136987
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Nature Science Foundation (52076037, 51806034&61633003-3)
- Jiangsu NSF (BK20170686)
- Jiangsu Province Key Lab of Aerospace Power System, NUAA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
- Keywords
- active disturbance rejection control, first order plus time delay model, controller tuning, extended state observer, time delay compensation, stability conditions, robustness, water tank experiments, process control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
