The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited
Abstract
The least-significant-bit (LSB)-based approach is a popular type of steganographic algorithms in the spatial domain. However, we find that in most existing approaches, the choice of embedding positions within a cover image mainly depends on a pseudorandom number generator without considering the relationship between the image content itself and the size of the secret message. Thus the smooth/flat regions in the cover images will inevitably be contaminated after data hiding even at a low embedding rate, and this will lead to poor visual quality and low security based on our analysis and extensive experiments, especially for those images with many smooth regions. In this paper, we expand the LSB matching revisited image steganography and propose an edge adaptive scheme which can select the embedding regions according to the size of secret message and the difference between two consecutive pixels in the cover image. For lower embedding rates, only sharper edge regions are used while keeping the other smoother regions as they are. When the embedding rate increases, more edge regions can be released adaptively for data hiding by adjusting just a few parameters. The experimental results evaluated on 6000 natural images with three specific and four universal steganalytic algorithms show that the new scheme can enhance the security significantly compared with typical LSB-based approaches as well as their edge adaptive ones, such as pixel-value-differencing-based approaches, while preserving higher visual quality of stego images at the same time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Fridrich, J., & Kodovsky, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2190402 · Cited by 2,144
Universal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain
Holub, V., Fridrich, J., & Denemark, T. (2014) · EURASIP Journal on Information Security · doi:10.1186/1687-417x-2014-1 · Cited by 1,202
Comprehensive survey of image steganography: Techniques, Evaluations, and trends in future research
Kadhim, I. J., Premaratne, P., Vial, P. J., & Halloran, B. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.075 · Cited by 452
Selection-channel-aware rich model for Steganalysis of digital images
Denemark, T., Sedighi, V., Holub, V., Cogranne, R., & Fridrich, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs.2014.7084302 · Cited by 375
CNN-Based Adversarial Embedding for Image Steganography
Tang, W., Li, B., Tan, S., Barni, M., & Huang, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2019.2891237 · Cited by 292
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, W., Huang, F., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2010-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-214
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151346626
- Cited by
- 661
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2010.2041812
- The paper
- Luo, W., Huang, F., & Huang, J. (2010). Edge Adaptive Image Steganography Based on LSB Matching Revisited. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2010.2041812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.