The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CNN-Based Adversarial Embedding for Image Steganography
Open accessAbstract
Steganographic schemes are commonly designed in a way to preserve image statistics or steganalytic features. Since most of the state-of-the-art steganalytic methods employ a machine learning (ML)-based classifier, it is reasonable to consider countering steganalysis by trying to fool the ML classifiers. However, simply applying perturbations on stego images as adversarial examples may lead to the failure of data extraction and introduce unexpected artifacts detectable by other classifiers. In this paper, we present a steganographic scheme with a novel operation called adversarial embedding (ADV-EMB), which achieves the goal of hiding a stego message while at the same time fooling a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based steganalyzer. The proposed method works under the conventional framework of distortion minimization. In particular, ADV-EMB adjusts the costs of image elements modifications according to the gradients back propagated from the target CNN steganalyzer. Therefore, modification direction has a higher probability to be the same as the inverse sign of the gradient. In this way, the so-called adversarial stego images are generated. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed steganographic scheme achieves better security performance against the target adversary-unaware steganalyzer by increasing its missed detection rate. In addition, it deteriorates the performance of other adversary-aware steganalyzers, opening the way to a new class of modern steganographic schemes capable of overcoming powerful CNN-based steganalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examples
Goodfellow, I. J., Shlens, J., & Szegedy, C. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6572 · Cited by 10,381
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
Adversarial examples in the physical world
Kurakin, A., Goodfellow, I. J., & Bengio, S. (2018) · Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security · doi:10.1201/9781351251389-8 · Cited by 5,375
DeepFool: A Simple and Accurate Method to Fool Deep Neural Networks
Moosavi-Dezfooli, S.-M., Fawzi, A., & Frossard, P. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.282 · Cited by 5,317
The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settings
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Jha, S., Fredrikson, M., Celik, Z. B., & Swami, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2016.36 · Cited by 3,993
Deep neural networks are easily fooled: High confidence predictions for unrecognizable images
Nguyen, A., Yosinski, J., & Clune, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298640 · Cited by 3,258
Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Fridrich, J., & Kodovsky, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2190402 · Cited by 2,144
”Break Our Steganographic System”: The Ins and Outs of Organizing BOSS
Bas, P., Filler, T., & Pevný, T. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24178-9_5 · Cited by 1,250
Universal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain
Holub, V., Fridrich, J., & Denemark, T. (2014) · EURASIP Journal on Information Security · doi:10.1186/1687-417x-2014-1 · Cited by 1,202
Ensemble Classifiers for Steganalysis of Digital Media
Kodovsky, J., Fridrich, J., & Holub, V. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2011.2175919 · Cited by 1,064
Cited by
When Machine Learning Meets Privacy in 6G: A Survey
Sun, Y., Liu, J., Wang, J., Cao, Y., & Kato, N. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3011561 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, W., Li, B., Tan, S., Barni, M., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2074-2087
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2794584741
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 13.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CNN-Based Adversarial Embedding for Image Steganography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2019.2891237
- The paper
- Tang, W., Li, B., Tan, S., Barni, M., & Huang, J. (2019). CNN-Based Adversarial Embedding for Image Steganography. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2019.2891237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.