The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Region Duplication Detection Using Image Feature Matching
Abstract
Region duplication is a simple and effective operation to create digital image forgeries, where a continuous portion of pixels in an image, after possible geometrical and illumination adjustments, are copied and pasted to a different location in the same image. Most existing region duplication detection methods are based on directly matching blocks of image pixels or transform coefficients, and are not effective when the duplicated regions have geometrical or illumination distortions. In this work, we describe a new region duplication detection method that is robust to distortions of the duplicated regions. Our method starts by estimating the transform between matched scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) keypoints, which are insensitive to geometrical and illumination distortions, and then finds all pixels within the duplicated regions after discounting the estimated transforms. The proposed method shows effective detection on an automatically synthesized forgery image database with duplicated and distorted regions. We further demonstrate its practical performance with several challenging forgery images created with state-of-the-art tools.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors
Ke, Y., & Sukthankar, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206 · Cited by 3,237
Cited by
An Evaluation of Popular Copy-Move Forgery Detection Approaches
Christlein, V., Riess, C., Jordan, J., Riess, C., & Angelopoulou, E. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2012.2218597 · Cited by 802
Efficient Dense-Field Copy–Move Forgery Detection
Cozzolino, D., Poggi, G., & Verdoliva, L. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2455334 · Cited by 451
Information Forensics: An Overview of the First Decade
Stamm, M. C., Wu, M., & Liu, K. J. R. (2013) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2013.2260814 · Cited by 394
Copy-move forgery detection and localization by means of robust clustering with J-Linkage
Amerini, I., Ballan, L., Caldelli, R., Del Bimbo, A., Del Tongo, L., & Serra, G. (2013) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2013.03.006 · Cited by 302
Copy–Move Forgery Detection by Matching Triangles of Keypoints
Ardizzone, E., Bruno, A., & Mazzola, G. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2445742 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Pan, X., & Lyu, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 857-867
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2137405310
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Region Duplication Detection Using Image Feature Matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2010.2078506
- The paper
- Pan, X., & Lyu, S. (2010). Region Duplication Detection Using Image Feature Matching. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2010.2078506
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.