The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rich Models for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Abstract
We describe a novel general strategy for building steganography detectors for digital images. The process starts with assembling a rich model of the noise component as a union of many diverse submodels formed by joint distributions of neighboring samples from quantized image noise residuals obtained using linear and nonlinear high-pass filters. In contrast to previous approaches, we make the model assembly a part of the training process driven by samples drawn from the corresponding cover- and stego-sources. Ensemble classifiers are used to assemble the model as well as the final steganalyzer due to their low computational complexity and ability to efficiently work with high-dimensional feature spaces and large training sets. We demonstrate the proposed framework on three steganographic algorithms designed to hide messages in images represented in the spatial domain: HUGO, edge-adaptive algorithm by Luo, and optimally coded ternary$\pm {\hbox{1}}$embedding. For each algorithm, we apply a simple submodel-selection technique to increase the detection accuracy per model dimensionality and show how the detection saturates with increasing complexity of the rich model. By observing the differences between how different submodels engage in detection, an interesting interplay between the embedding and detection is revealed. Steganalysis built around rich image models combined with ensemble classifiers is a promising direction towards automatizing steganalysis for a wide spectrum of s…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Existing works (Fridrich and Kodovsky 2012) have proved that the high-frequency features can help to boost the generalization ability.”
From Dual Contrastive Learning for General Face Forgery Detection (2022) · cites this paper as Fridrich and Kodovsky 2012
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Breiman, L. (1996) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00058655 · Cited by 16,325
Libsvm : A library for support vector machines
Ferrari, V. (2008) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,123
Information Hiding Techniques for Steganography and Digital Watermarking
Katzenbeisser, S., & Petitcolas, F. A. P. (1999) · Cited by 1,895
Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods
Kolda, T. G., Lewis, R. M., & Torczon, V. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450242889 · Cited by 1,659
Feature extraction : foundations and applications
Guyon, I., Gunn, S. R., Nikravesh, M., & zadeh, L. N. (2006) · Cited by 1,658
Ensemble Classifiers for Steganalysis of Digital Media
Kodovský, J., Fridrich, J., & Holub, V. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2011.2175919 · Cited by 1,084
Self-citationUsing High-Dimensional Image Models to Perform Highly Undetectable Steganography
Pevný, T., Filler, T., & Bas, P. (2010) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-16435-4_13 · Cited by 1,026
Minimizing Additive Distortion in Steganography Using Syndrome-Trellis Codes
Filler, T., Judas, J., & Fridrich, J. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2011.2134094 · Cited by 968
Self-citationSteganalysis by Subtractive Pixel Adjacency Matrix
Pevný, T., Bas, P., & Fridrich, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2010.2045842 · Cited by 899
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- upham, 0, Steganographic Algorithm JSteg
- filler, 2010, BOSS (Break Our Steganography System)
- kirchner, 2010, On detection of median filtering in images, Proc SPIE Electronic Imaging Media Forensics and Security XII, 7542, 10 1
- kodovsk, 2011, On dangers of cross-validation in steganalysis Tech Rep
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314
Universal distortion function for steganography in an arbitrary domain
Holub, V., Fridrich, J., & Denemark, T. (2014) · EURASIP Journal on Information Security · doi:10.1186/1687-417x-2014-1 · Cited by 1,212
Self-citationFace X-Ray for More General Face Forgery Detection
Li, L., Bao, J., Zhang, T., Yang, H., Chen, D., Wen, F., & Guo, B. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00505 · Cited by 1,211
Thinking in Frequency: Face Forgery Detection by Mining Frequency-Aware Clues
Qian, Y., Yin, G., Sheng, L., Chen, Z., & Shao, J. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58610-2_6 · Cited by 1,058
Deep Residual Network for Steganalysis of Digital Images
Boroumand, M., Chen, M., & Fridrich, J. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2018.2871749 · Cited by 1,049
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fridrich, J., & Kodovsky, J.
- Affiliations
- Binghamton University (US)
- ORCID
- Fridrich, Jessica
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 868-882
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2009130368
- Cited by
- 2,144
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 169 · 2025: 198 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 218 · 2022: 235 · 2021: 234 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 173 · 2018: 127 · 2017: 100 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 57.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-09-1-0147)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Keywords
- steganalysis, image steganography, ensemble classifiers, high-pass filter, Hugo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
