Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 485

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Representations for Iris, Face, and Fingerprint Spoofing Detection

Open access
Menotti, David, Chiachia, Giovani, Pinto, Allan, Robson Schwartz, William, Pedrini, Helio, Xavier Falcao, Alexandre, Rocha, Anderson·2015·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Biometrics systems have significantly improved person identification and authentication, playing an important role in personal, national, and global security. However, these systems might be deceived (or spoofed) and, despite the recent advances in spoofing detection, current solutions often rely on domain knowledge, specific biometric reading systems, and attack types. We assume a very limited knowledge about biometric spoofing at the sensor to derive outstanding spoofing detection systems for iris, face, and fingerprint modalities based on two deep learning approaches. The first approach consists of learning suitable convolutional network architectures for each domain, whereas the second approach focuses on learning the weights of the network via back propagation. We consider nine biometric spoofing benchmarks - each one containing real and fake samples of a given biometric modality and attack type - and learn deep representations for each benchmark by combining and contrasting the two learning approaches. This strategy not only provides better comprehension of how these approaches interplay, but also creates systems that exceed the best known results in eight out of the nine benchmarks. The results strongly indicate that spoofing detection systems based on convolutional networks can be robust to attacks already known and possibly adapted, with little effort, to image-based attacks that are yet to come.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2015.2398817

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 485

Metadata

Authors
Menotti, D., Chiachia, G., Pinto, A., Robson Schwartz, W., Pedrini, H., Xavier Falcao, A., & Rocha, A.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2015-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
864-879
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2136975665
Cited by
485
References
48
FWCI
60.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep Representations for Iris, Face, and Fingerprint Spoofing Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2015.2398817
The paper
Menotti, D., Chiachia, G., Pinto, A., Robson Schwartz, W., Pedrini, H., Xavier Falcao, A., & Rocha, A. (2015). Deep Representations for Iris, Face, and Fingerprint Spoofing Detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2015.2398817

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.