The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Face Spoof Detection With Image Distortion Analysis
Abstract
Automatic face recognition is now widely used in applications ranging from deduplication of identity to authentication of mobile payment. This popularity of face recognition has raised concerns about face spoof attacks (also known as biometric sensor presentation attacks), where a photo or video of an authorized person's face could be used to gain access to facilities or services. While a number of face spoof detection techniques have been proposed, their generalization ability has not been adequately addressed. We propose an efficient and rather robust face spoof detection algorithm based on image distortion analysis (IDA). Four different features (specular reflection, blurriness, chromatic moment, and color diversity) are extracted to form the IDA feature vector. An ensemble classifier, consisting of multiple SVM classifiers trained for different face spoof attacks (e.g., printed photo and replayed video), is used to distinguish between genuine (live) and spoof faces. The proposed approach is extended to multiframe face spoof detection in videos using a voting-based scheme. We also collect a face spoof database, MSU mobile face spoofing database (MSU MFSD), using two mobile devices (Google Nexus 5 and MacBook Air) with three types of spoof attacks (printed photo, replayed video with iPhone 5S, and replayed video with iPad Air). Experimental results on two public-domain face spoof databases (Idiap REPLAY-ATTACK and CASIA FASD), and the MSU MFSD database show that the proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in spoof detection. Our results also highlight the difficulty in separating genuine and spoof faces, especially in cross-database and cross-device scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers
Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992) · Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational learning theory · doi:10.1145/130385.130401 · Cited by 11,992
Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems
Jain, A., Nandakumar, K., & Ross, A. (2005) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.012 · Cited by 2,154
Self-citationEulerian video magnification for revealing subtle changes in the world
Wu, H.-Y., Rubinstein, M., Shih, E., Guttag, J., Durand, F., & Freeman, W. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2185520.2185561 · Cited by 1,357
Using color to separate reflection components
Shafer, S. A. (1985) · Color Research & Application · doi:10.1002/col.5080100409 · Cited by 1,275
Bashashati, A., Fatourechi, M., Ward, R. K., & Birch, G. E. (2007) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/r03 · Cited by 907
(2012) · Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) · Cited by 826
A face antispoofing database with diverse attacks
Zhang, Z., Yan, J., Liu, S., Lei, Z., Yi, D., & Li, S. Z. (2012) · 2012 5th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB) · doi:10.1109/icb.2012.6199754 · Cited by 816
Face spoofing detection from single images using micro-texture analysis
Maatta, J., Hadid, A., & Pietikainen, M. (2011) · 2011 International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) · doi:10.1109/ijcb.2011.6117510 · Cited by 679
Cited by
A comprehensive survey on support vector machine classification: Applications, challenges and trends
Cervantes, J., Garcia-Lamont, F., Rodríguez-Mazahua, L., & Lopez, A. (2020) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.118 · Cited by 2,381
Domain Generalization: A Survey
Zhou, K., Liu, Z., Qiao, Y., Xiang, T., & Loy, C. C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2022.3195549 · Cited by 1,315
Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Survey
Yang, J., Zhou, K., Li, Y., & Liu, Z. (2024) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-024-02117-4 · Cited by 884
DeepFakes: a New Threat to Face Recognition? Assessment and Detection
Korshunov, P., & Marcel, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.08685 · Cited by 497
Efficient Acceleration of Deep Learning Inference on Resource-Constrained Edge Devices: A Review
Shuvo, M. M. H., Islam, S. K., Cheng, J., & Morshed, B. I. (2023) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3226481 · Cited by 436
“For instance, face recognition is being actively used in door unlocking, mobile banking [383], device unlocking [384], and so on.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Wen, D., Han, H., & Jain, A. K.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 746-761
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2003092530
- Cited by
- 905
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 58.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Face Spoof Detection With Image Distortion Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2015.2400395
- The paper
- Wen, D., Han, H., & Jain, A. K. (2015). Face Spoof Detection With Image Distortion Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2015.2400395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.