The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revocable and Scalable Certificateless Remote Authentication Protocol With Anonymity for Wireless Body Area Networks
Abstract
To ensure the security and privacy of the patient's health status in the wireless body area networks (WBANs), it is critical to secure the extra-body communication between the smart portable device held by the WBAN client and the application providers, such as the hospital, physician or medical staff. Based on certificateless cryptography, this paper proposes a remote authentication protocol featured with nonrepudiation, client anonymity, key escrow resistance, and revocability for extra-body communication in the WBANs. First, we present a certificateless encryption scheme and a certificateless signature scheme with efficient revocation against short-term key exposure, which we believe are of independent interest. Then, a certificateless anonymous remote authentication with revocation is constructed by incorporating the proposed encryption scheme and signature scheme. Our revocation mechanism is highly scalable, which is especially suitable for the large-scale WBANs, in the sense that the key-update overhead on the side of trusted party increased logarithmically in the number of users. As far as we know, this is the first time considering the revocation functionality of anonymous remote authentication for the WBANs. Both theoretic analysis and experimental simulations show that the proposed authentication protocol is provably secure in the random oracle model and highly practical.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Password authentication with insecure communication
Lamport, L. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358790.358797 · Cited by 2,789
Cited by
Shen, J., Gui, Z., Ji, S., Shen, J., Tan, H., & Tang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.01.003 · Cited by 267
A lightweight multi-layer authentication protocol for wireless body area networks
Shen, J., Chang, S., Shen, J., Liu, Q., & Sun, X. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.033 · Cited by 258
A blockchain-based medical data sharing and protection scheme
Liu, X., Wang, Z., Jin, C., Li, F., & Li, G. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2937685 · Cited by 239
Dew-Cloud-Based Hierarchical Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in IoMT
Singh, P., Gaba, G. S., Kaur, A., Hedabou, M., & Gurtov, A. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2022.3186250 · Cited by 103
Blockchain Enabled Anonymous Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for Internet of Health Things
Rajasekaran, A. S., Maria, A., Rajagopal, M., & Lorincz, J. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23010240 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, H., & Qin, Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1442-1455
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2091299352
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revocable and Scalable Certificateless Remote Authentication Protocol With Anonymity for Wireless Body Area Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2015.2414399
- The paper
- Xiong, H., & Qin, Z. (2015). Revocable and Scalable Certificateless Remote Authentication Protocol With Anonymity for Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2015.2414399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.