Cited by 26Advanced Authentication Protocols SecurityBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Blockchain Enabled Anonymous Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for Internet of Health Things

Open access
Rajasekaran, Arun Sekar, Maria, Azees, Rajagopal, Maheswar, Lorincz, Josip·2022·Sensors

Abstract

The Internet of Health Things (IoHT) has emerged as an attractive networking paradigm in wireless communications, integrated devices and embedded system technologies. In the IoHT, real-time health data are collected through smart healthcare sensors and, in recent years, the IoHT has started to have an important role in the Internet of Things technology. Although the IoHT provides comfort in health monitoring, it also imposes security challenges in maintaining patient data confidentiality and privacy. To overcome such security issues, in this paper, a novel blockchain-based privacy-preserving authentication scheme is proposed as an approach for achieving efficient authentication of the patient without the involvement of a trusted entity. Moreover, a secure handover authentication mechanism that ensures avoiding the patient re-authentication in multi-doctor communication scenarios and revoking the possible malicious misbehavior of medical professionals in the IoHT communication with the patient is developed. The performance of the proposed authentication and handover scheme is analyzed concerning the existing state-of-the-art authentication schemes. The results of the performance analyses reveal that the proposed authentication scheme is resistant to different types of security attacks. Moreover, the results of analyses show that the proposed authentication scheme outperforms similar state-of-the-art authentication schemes in terms of having lower computational, communication and storage costs. Therefore, the novel authentication and handover scheme has proven practical applicability and represents a valuable contribution to improving the security of communication in IoHT networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s23010240

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both privacy and security are popular topics of research and several approaches have been proposed including anonymity frameworks, differential privacy, and blockchain-based solutions.

    “Both privacy and security are popular topics of research and several approaches have been proposed including anonymity frameworks [203] to more recently proposed differential privacy [204], and blockchain-based solutions [205].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajasekaran, A. S., Maria, A., Rajagopal, M., & Lorincz, J.
Affiliations
  • KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology (IN)
  • VIT-AP University (IN)
  • Department of ECE, Centre for IoT and AI (CITI), KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Coimbatore 641407, India
  • Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture (FESB), University of Split, 21000 Split, Croatia
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-26
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
240
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313326947
Cited by
26
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
Internet of Medical Things, blockchain, privacy-preserving authentication, anonymous authentication, handover authentication, patient data privacy, health data security
MeSH terms
Internet of Things, Blockchain, Confidentiality, Humans, Computer Security, Privacy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review