The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effective and Efficient Global Context Verification for Image Copy Detection
Abstract
To detect illegal copies of copyrighted images, recent copy detection methods mostly rely on the bag-of-visual-words (BOW) model, in which local features are quantized into visual words for image matching. However, both the limited discriminability of local features and the BOW quantization errors will lead to many false local matches, which make it hard to distinguish similar images from copies. Geometric consistency verification is a popular technology for reducing the false matches, but it neglects global context information of local features and thus cannot solve this problem well. To address this problem, this paper proposes a global context verification scheme to filter false matches for copy detection. More specifically, after obtaining initial scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) matches between images based on the BOW quantization, the overlapping region-based global context descriptor (OR-GCD) is proposed for the verification of these matches to filter false matches. The OR-GCD not only encodes relatively rich global context information of SIFT features but also has good robustness and efficiency. Thus, it allows an effective and efficient verification. Furthermore, a fast image similarity measurement based on random verification is proposed to efficiently implement copy detection. In addition, we also extend the proposed method for partial-duplicate image detection. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves higher accuracy than the state-of-the-art methods, and has comparable efficiency to the baseline method based on the BOW quantization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts
Belongie, S., Malik, J., & Puzicha, J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.993558 · Cited by 6,306
Scalable Recognition with a Vocabulary Tree
Nister, D., & Stewenius, H. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.264 · Cited by 3,579
PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors
Ke, Y., & Sukthankar, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206 · Cited by 3,237
Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching
Philbin, J., Chum, O., Isard, M., Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A. (2007) · 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2007.383172 · Cited by 2,929
Hamming Embedding and Weak Geometric Consistency for Large Scale Image Search
Jegou, H., Douze, M., & Schmid, C. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_24 · Cited by 1,901 · cited 3×
“Recently, many geometric verification strategies [7], [12]–[17] have been proposed to reduce false matches.”
BackgroundMethod
Cited by
Kumar, R., Tripathi, R., Marchang, N., Srivastava, G., Gadekallu, T. R., & Xiong, N. N. (2021) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2021.02.022 · Cited by 140
Robust Image Hashing With Isomap and Saliency Map for Copy Detection
Liang, X., Tang, Z., Wu, J., Li, Z., & Zhang, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2021.3139217 · Cited by 32
Video Copy Detection Using Spatio-Temporal CNN Features
Zhou, Z., Chen, J., Yang, C.-N., & Sun, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2930173 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, Z., Wang, Y., Wu, Q. M. J., Yang, C.-N., & Sun, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 48-63
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2518058967
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 61.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effective and Efficient Global Context Verification for Image Copy Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2016.2601065
- The paper
- Zhou, Z., Wang, Y., Wu, Q. M. J., Yang, C.-N., & Sun, X. (2017). Effective and Efficient Global Context Verification for Image Copy Detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2016.2601065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
