The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching
Abstract
In this paper, we present a large-scale object retrieval system. The user supplies a query object by selecting a region of a query image, and the system returns a ranked list of images that contain the same object, retrieved from a large corpus. We demonstrate the scalability and performance of our system on a dataset of over 1 million images crawled from the photo-sharing site, Flickr [3], using Oxford landmarks as queries. Building an image-feature vocabulary is a major time and performance bottleneck, due to the size of our dataset. To address this problem we compare different scalable methods for building a vocabulary and introduce a novel quantization method based on randomized trees which we show outperforms the current state-of-the-art on an extensive ground-truth. Our experiments show that the quantization has a major effect on retrieval quality. To further improve query performance, we add an efficient spatial verification stage to re-rank the results returned from our bag-of-words model and show that this consistently improves search quality, though by less of a margin when the visual vocabulary is large. We view this work as a promising step towards much larger, "web-scale" image corpora.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
Self-citationVideo Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Scale & Affine Invariant Interest Point Detectors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000027790.02288.f2 · Cited by 3,436
Cited by
CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition
Razavian, A. S., Azizpour, H., Sullivan, J., & Carlsson, S. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2014.131 · Cited by 4,451
Product Quantization for Nearest Neighbor Search
Jégou, H., Douze, M., & Schmid, C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.57 · Cited by 2,956
Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features
Caron, M., Bojanowski, P., Joulin, A., & Douze, M. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_9 · Cited by 2,674
FAST APPROXIMATE NEAREST NEIGHBORS WITH AUTOMATIC ALGORITHM CONFIGURATION
(2009) · Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications · doi:10.5220/0001787803310340 · Cited by 2,640
Soft-NMS — Improving Object Detection with One Line of Code
Bodla, N., Singh, B., Chellappa, R., & Davis, L. S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.593 · Cited by 2,274
“It was first employed in edge detec ion techniques [22].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Philbin, J., Chum, O., Isard, M., Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A.
- Venue
- 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2007-06
- Pages
- 1-8
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141362318
- Cited by
- 2,929
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 73.08
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.2007.383172
- The paper
- Philbin, J., Chum, O., Isard, M., Sivic, J., & Zisserman, A. (2007). Object retrieval with large vocabularies and fast spatial matching. 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2007.383172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.