Large-Scale Image Clustering Based on Camera Fingerprints
Open accessAbstract
Practical applications of digital forensics are often faced with the challenge of grouping large-scale suspicious images into a vast number of clusters, each containing images taken by the same camera. This task can be approached by resorting to the use of sensor pattern noise (SPN), which serves as the fingerprint of the camera. The challenges of large-scale image clustering come from the sheer volume of the image set and the high dimensionality of each image. The difficulties can be further aggravated when the number of classes (i.e., the number of cameras) is much higher than the average size of class (i.e., the number of images acquired by each camera). We refer to this as the NC ≫ SC problem, which is not uncommon in many practical scenarios. In this paper, we propose a novel clustering framework that is capable of addressing the NC ≫ SC problem without a training process. The proposed clustering framework was evaluated on the Dresden image database and compared with the state-of-the-art SPN-based image clustering algorithms. Experimental results show that the proposed clustering framework is much faster than the state-of-the-art algorithms while maintaining a high level of clustering quality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Caldelli et al.'s optical flow approach is comparable with state-of-the-art methods in classification accuracy on the FaceForensics++ dataset.
“The results obtained using the FaceForensics++ dataset [105] show that this approach is comparable with state-of-the-art methods in terms of classification accuracy.”
From Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey (2022) · cites this paper as [105]
Cites
BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases
Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., & Livny, M. (1996) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/235968.233324 · Cited by 2,097 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11573 · Cited by 464
Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M. (2022) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, X., & Li, C.-T.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W2560266592
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Clustering Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital and Cyber Forensics
- Keywords
- image clustering, camera fingerprint, sensor pattern noise, camera identification, digital forensics, unsupervised clustering, high-dimensional data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review