The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Secure Frequency Control of Hybrid Power System Under DoS Attacks via Lie Algebra
Abstract
Secure frequency control of multi-area hybrid power systems with wind power is a research problem involving active defense, vulnerability, and resilience. Considering the scenario that Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack intrude into the control channels of thermal power and wind farm, the hybrid power system is modeled by a switched system with four subsystems. Then, the exponential stability of hybrid power system is studied under arbitrary DoS attack. An active defense scheme is proposed to design switched control gains by Lie algebra method achieved by a distributed consensus method. Furthermore, following the resulted exponential stability, the load disturbance attenuant performance of frequency control is studied by the proposed concepts of vulnerability point and resilience point. Under a class of event-DoS attack model, the estimation method of vulnerability point and resilience point is given. Finally, simulations of a three-area hybrid power system and NE39bus test system are carried out to verify our theories.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Wireless and wired networks are crucial for DDoS attacks against the transport layer.
“Wireless and wired networks are crucial for DDoS attacks against the transport layer [17].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
When multiple parties cooperate in computing, each party knows only its own private data, a party's private data is not disclosed to other participants, and there is no central trust party that can access any participant's data; after computing, each party obtains only the correct final results.
“When multiple parties need to cooperate in computing, each party knows only its own private data, a party's private data is not disclosed to other participants, and there is no central trust party that can access any participant's data. After computing is completed, each party can obtain the correct final results only, not others' private data [17].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2931636 · DOI
- 10.1109/TII.2020.3046633 · DOI
- 10.1109/ISGT.2014.6816504 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2631891 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICMLC.2013.6890450 · DOI
- 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6257525 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.comnet.2012.12.017 · DOI
- 10.1109/TETCI.2017.2739838 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2014.2363786 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2016.2607701 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2017.2676721 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2019.2928624 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2896292 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2824253 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.064 · DOI
- 10.1109/TII.2019.2955739 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3001187 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3030028 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCSI.2019.2948015 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCSI.2020.3007953 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2956137 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAC.2020.2989773 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2903817 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3090024 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2634122 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2895060 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105496 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6469 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2972384 · DOI
- 10.1109/TVT.2020.2983565 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3049373 · DOI
- 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2020.00840 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3005283 · DOI
- 10.1109/TII.2021.3116165 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2021.3118801 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2019.08.036 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3073060 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMC.2019.2956945 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIFS.2019.2917373 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCSI.2021.3120080 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAC.2011.2106252 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAC.2012.2218151 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0511 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207179.2015.1088967 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2819695 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.071 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-84878-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.12.015 · DOI
- 10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3112232 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, Z., Yue, D., Shen, S., Hu, S., & Chen, L.
- Affiliations
- Henan University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Shaoxing University (CN)
- Yangzhou University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 1172-1184
- ISSN
- 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6021
- OpenAlex
- W4226434229
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 3.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Key Scientific Research Projects in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (22A413007)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61833008, 61633016, 62173187, 61772018)
- Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ22F020002)
- Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province of China (RLD201810)
- Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province of China (QL 04317006)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BE2020001-4, BK20201377)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Frequency Control in Power Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
- Keywords
- frequency regulation, hybrid energy systems, denial-of-service attacks, switched systems, Lie algebras, switching control, distributed consensus, wind energy, interconnected power systems, cyber-physical security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review