The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of Parallel Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Real-Time UAV Path Planning
Abstract
The development of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is of high interest to many governmental and military organizations around the world. An essential aspect of UAV autonomy is the ability for automatic path planning. In this paper, we use the genetic algorithm (GA) and the particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) to cope with the complexity of the problem and compute feasible and quasi-optimal trajectories for fixed wing UAVs in a complex 3D environment, while considering the dynamic properties of the vehicle. The characteristics of the optimal path are represented in the form of a multiobjective cost function that we developed. The paths produced are composed of line segments, circular arcs and vertical helices. We reduce the execution time of our solutions by using the “single-program, multiple-data” parallel programming paradigm and we achieve real-time performance on standard commercial off-the-shelf multicore CPUs. After achieving a quasi-linear speedup of 7.3 on 8 cores and an execution time of 10 s for both algorithms, we conclude that by using a parallel implementation on standard multicore CPUs, real-time path planning for UAVs is possible. Moreover, our rigorous comparison of the two algorithms shows, with statistical significance, that the GA produces superior trajectories to the PSO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Otto, A., Agatz, N., Campbell, J., Golden, B., & Pesch, E. (2018) · Networks · doi:10.1002/net.21818 · Cited by 985
“Thus, we do not include articles on obstacle-avoiding path planning from a given starting point to a given end point [12, 63, 108, 153, 194, 203, 220, 227, 245, 306] or on planning trajectories of drones flying in formation [220].”
BackgroundListou Ellefsen, A., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027 · Cited by 523
Mobile robot path planning using membrane evolutionary artificial potential field
Orozco-Rosas, U., Montiel, O., & Sepúlveda, R. (2019) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.036 · Cited by 426
Airborne Communication Networks: A Survey
Cao, X., Yang, P., Alzenad, M., Xi, X., Wu, D., & Yanikomeroglu, H. (2018) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2018.2864423 · Cited by 331
The role of artificial intelligence in photo-voltaic systems design and control: A review
Youssef, A., El-Telbany, M., & Zekry, A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.046 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberge, V., Tarbouchi, M., & Labonte, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-141
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2077831477
- Cited by
- 1,059
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Parallel Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Real-Time UAV Path Planning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2012.2198665
- The paper
- Roberge, V., Tarbouchi, M., & Labonte, G. (2013). Comparison of Parallel Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization for Real-Time UAV Path Planning. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2012.2198665
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.