Probabilistic hosting capacity for active distribution networks
Abstract
The increased connection of distributed generation (DG), such as photovoltaic (PV) and wind turbine (WT), has shifted the current distribution networks from being passive (consuming energy) into active (consuming/producing energy). However, there is still no consensus about how to determine the maximum amount of DGs that are allowed to be connected, i.e., how to quantify a so-called “hosting capacity” (HC). Therefore, this paper proposes a novel risk assessment tool for estimating network HC by considering uncertainties associated with PV, WT, and loads. This evaluation is performed using the likelihood approximation approach. The paper, also, proposes a utilization of clearness index for localized solar irradiance prediction of PV. In addition, we propose the use of sparse grid technique as an effective means for uncertainty computation while the use of Monte Carlo technique is taken for a comparison purpose. Two actual distribution networks (11-buses and South Australian large feeder) are considered as case studies to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed tool.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors in [102] present a risk assessment tool for determining the HC of a distribution network using the sparse grid technique for uncertainties computation.
“Similarly, the authors in [102] present a risk assessment tool for determining the HC of a distribution network using the sparse grid technique for uncertainties computation.”
From Methods and Tools for PV and EV Hosting Capacity Determination in Low Voltage Distribution Networks—A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [102]
Cites
Olivares, D. E., Mehrizi-Sani, A., Etemadi, A. H., Canizares, C. A., Iravani, R., Kazerani, M., Hajimiragha, A. H., Gomis-Bellmunt, O., Saeedifard, M., Palma-Behnke, R., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2013.2295514 · Cited by 3,137 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Umoh, V., Davidson, I., Adebiyi, A., & Ekpe, U. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16083609 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Yao, H., Qin, W., Jing, X., Zhu, Z., Wang, K., Han, X., & Wang, P. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119681 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
- Authors
- Al-Saadi, H., Zivanovic, R., & Al-Sarawi, S. F.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- ORCID
- Al-Sarawi, Said F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2519-2532
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2609255995
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Power System Reliability and Maintenance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- hosting capacity, active distribution networks, distributed generation, photovoltaic generation, wind turbines, risk assessment, uncertainty quantification, likelihood approximation, clearness index, solar irradiance forecasting, sparse grids, Monte Carlo comparison, load uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review