The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PPFA: Privacy Preserving Fog-Enabled Aggregation in Smart Grid
Abstract
For constrained end devices in Internet of Things, such as smart meters (SMs), data transmission is an energy-consuming operation. To address this problem, we propose an efficient and privacy-preserving aggregation system with the aid of Fog computing architecture, named PPFA, which enables the intermediate Fog nodes to periodically collect data from nearby SMs and accurately derive aggregate statistics as the fine-grained Fog level aggregation. The Cloud/utility supplier computes overall aggregate statistics by aggregating Fog level aggregation. To minimize the privacy leakage and mitigate the utility loss, we use more efficient and concentrated Gaussian mechanism to distribute noise generation among parties, thus offering provable differential privacy guarantees of the aggregate statistic on both Fog level and Cloud level. In addition, to ensure aggregator obliviousness and system robustness, we put forward a two-layer encryption scheme: the first layer applies OTP to encrypt individual noisy measurement to achieve aggregator obliviousness, while the second layer uses public-key cryptography for authentication purpose. Our scheme is simple, efficient, and practical, it requires only one round of data exchange among a SM, its connected Fog node and the Cloud if there are no node failures, otherwise, one extra round is needed between a meter, its connected Fog node, and the trusted third party.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Mhamdi et al. [140] proposed a meta-aggregation rule called Bulyan, a two-step meta-aggregation algorithm based on the Krum and trimmed median, which filters malicious updates followed by computing the trimmed median of the remaining updates.”
From Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses (2024) · cites this paper as [140]
Citations
Cites
A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms
Elgamal, T. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1985.1057074 · Cited by 8,059
Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis
Dwork, C., McSherry, F., Nissim, K., & Smith, A. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11681878_14 · Cited by 7,272
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250
Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices
Gentry, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the forty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/1536414.1536440 · Cited by 6,806
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000042 · Cited by 5,557
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172
The Algorithmic Foundations of Differential Privacy
Dwork, C., & Roth, A. (2013) · doi:10.1561/9781601988195 · Cited by 3,856
Smart Grid Technologies: Communication Technologies and Standards
Güngör, V. Ç., Sahin, D., Koçak, T., Ergüt, S., Buccella, C., Cecati, C., & Hancke, G. P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2011.2166794 · Cited by 2,694
Our Data, Ourselves: Privacy Via Distributed Noise Generation
Dwork, C., Kenthapadi, K., McSherry, F., Mironov, I., & Naor, M. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11761679_29 · Cited by 1,835
EPPA: An Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Aggregation Scheme for Secure Smart Grid Communications
Lu, R., Liang, X., Li, X., Lin, X., & Shen, X. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2012.86 · Cited by 769
Secure Multiparty Computation and Secret Sharing
Cramer, R., Damgård, I. B., & Nielsen, J. B. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107337756 · Cited by 595
Secure Information Aggregation for Smart Grids Using Homomorphic Encryption
Li, F., Luo, B., & Liu, P. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) · doi:10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622064 · Cited by 574
Zhu, S., Setia, S. K., Jajodia, S., & Ning, P. (2004) · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P) · doi:10.1109/secpri.2004.1301328 · Cited by 556
Differentially private aggregation of distributed time-series with transformation and encryption
Rastogi, V., & Nath, S. (2010) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/1807167.1807247 · Cited by 545
Efficient aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks
Castelluccia, C., Mykletun, E., & Tsudik, G. (2005) · EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous) · doi:10.1109/mobiquitous.2005.25 · Cited by 528
Dynamic energy-aware cloudlet-based mobile cloud computing model for green computing
Gai, K., Meikang Qiu, A., Zhao, H., Tao, L., & Zong, Z. (2015) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.05.016 · Cited by 488
I Have a DREAM! (DiffeRentially privatE smArt Metering)
Ács, G., & Castelluccia, C. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24178-9_9 · Cited by 388
Privacy-Friendly Aggregation for the Smart-Grid
Kursawe, K., Danezis, G., & Kohlweiss, M. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22263-4_10 · Cited by 380
Smart Meter Privacy: A Theoretical Framework
Sankar, L., Rajagopalan, S. R., Mohajer, S., & Poor, H. V. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2012.2211046 · Cited by 272
Privacy-Preserving Stream Aggregation with Fault Tolerance
Chan, T.-H. H., Shi, E., & Song, D. X. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32946-3_15 · Cited by 210
Private Computation of Spatial and Temporal Power Consumption with Smart Meters
Erkin, Z., & Tsudik, G. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31284-7_33 · Cited by 193
Anderson, R., & Fuloria, S. (2010) · IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm) · doi:10.1109/smartgrid.2010.5622026 · Cited by 119
Fog-Empowered Anomaly Detection in IoT Using Hyperellipsoidal Clustering
Lyu, L., Jin, J., Rajasegarar, S., He, X., & Palaniswami, M. S. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2709942 · Cited by 118
Self-citationDifferential privacy for real smart metering data
Eibl, G., & Engel, D. (2016) · Computer Science - Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s00450-016-0310-y · Cited by 88
An improved scheme for privacy-preserving collaborative anomaly detection
Lyu, L., Law, Y. W., Erfani, S., Leckie, C. A., & Palaniswami, M. S. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2016.7457159 · Cited by 16
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- shi, 0, Privacy-preserving aggregation of time-series data, Proc Symp Network and Distributed System Security
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Khan, W. Z., Ahmed, E., Hakak, S., Yaqoob, I., & Ahmed, A. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.02.050 · Cited by 1,157
Privacy and Robustness in Federated Learning: Attacks and Defenses
Lyu, L., Yu, H., Ma, X., Chen, C., Sun, L., Zhao, J., Yang, Q., & Yu, P. S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2022.3216981 · Cited by 548
Self-citationDecentralized Privacy Using Blockchain-Enabled Federated Learning in Fog Computing
Qu, Y., Gao, L., Luan, T. H., Xiang, Y., Yu, S., Li, B., & Zheng, G. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2977383 · Cited by 451
Wang, J., Wu, L., Choo, K. R., & He, D. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2936278 · Cited by 301
Hazra, A., Rana, P., Adhikari, M., & Amgoth, T. (2023) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100549 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyu, L., Nandakumar, K., Rubinstein, B., Jin, J., Bedo, J., & Palaniswami, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- IBM (United States) (US)
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3733-3744
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2786010450
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 12
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving data aggregation, fog computing, smart grid, smart meters, Internet of Things, differential privacy, Gaussian mechanism, one-time pad encryption, public-key cryptography, energy-efficient data transmission, trusted third party
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
