The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Survey on Model-Based Distributed Control and Filtering for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems
Open accessAbstract
Industrial cyber-physical systems (CPSs) are large-scale, geographically dispersed, and life-critical systems, in which lots of sensors and actuators are embedded and networked together to facilitate real-time monitoring and closed-loop control. Their intrinsic features in geographic space and resources put forward to urgent requirements of reliability and scalability for designed filtering or control schemes. This paper presents a review of the state-of-the-art of distributed filtering and control of industrial CPSs described by differential dynamics models. Special attention is paid to sensor networks, manipulators, and power systems. For real-time monitoring, some typical Kalman-based distributed algorithms are summarized and their performances on calculation burden and communication burden, as well as scalability, are discussed in depth. Then, the characteristics of non-Kalman cases are further disclosed in light of constructed filter structures. Furthermore, the latest development is surveyed for distributed cooperative control of mobile manipulators and distributed model predictive control in industrial automation systems. By resorting to droop characteristics, representative distributed control strategies classified by controller structures are systematically summarized for power systems with the requirements of power sharing and voltage and frequency regulation. In addition, distributed security control of industrial CPSs is reviewed when cyber-attacks are taken into consideration. Finally, some challenges are raised to guide the future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: A survey
Bhamare, D., Zolanvari, M., Erbad, A., Jain, R., Khan, K., & Meskin, N. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.101677 · Cited by 394
Distributed Krein space-based attack detection over sensor networks under deception attacks
Ge, X., Han, Q.-L., Zhong, M., & Zhang, X.-M. (2019) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108557 · Cited by 341
Self-citationCybersecurity of industrial cyber-physical systems: A review
Kayan, H., Nunes, M., Rana, O., Burnap, P., & Perera, C. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3510410 · Cited by 261
Lv, Z. (2023) · Research · doi:10.34133/research.0071 · Cited by 108
“This systematic approach must model the interactions of various scales of dynamically interacting systems [65,66].”
Machine Learning for DDoS Attack Detection in Industry 4.0 CPPSs
Saghezchi, F. B., Mantas, G., Violas, M. A., de Oliveira Duarte, A. M., & Rodriguez, J. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11040602 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, D., Han, Q.-L., Wang, Z., & Ge, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2483-2499
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2922520136
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Model-Based Distributed Control and Filtering for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2019.2905295
- The paper
- Ding, D., Han, Q.-L., Wang, Z., & Ge, X. (2019). A Survey on Model-Based Distributed Control and Filtering for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2905295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.