Cited by 83Software-Defined Networks and 5GNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlAdvanced Optical Network Technologies

SDN-Enabled Energy-Efficient Routing Optimization Framework for Industrial Internet of Things

Naeem, Faisal, Tariq, Muhammad, Poor, H. Vincent·2021·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

The traditional Internet architecture relies on the best-effort principle, which is not suitable for critical industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) applications such as healthcare systems with stringent quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. In this article, a software-defined network (SDN) based on an analytical parallel routing framework is proposed by using the massive processing power of a graphics processing unit (GPU) for dynamically optimizing multiconstrained QoS parameters in the IIoT. The framework considers three types of QoS applications for smart healthcare traffic: loss-sensitive, delay-sensitive, and jitter-sensitive. A QoS-enabled routing optimization problem is formulated as a max-flow min-cost problem, while a greedy heuristic that dispatches the path calculation task concurrently to the GPU for calculating optimal forwarding paths considering the QoS requirement of each flow is proposed. The results show that the proposed scheme efficiently utilizes the limited bandwidth cost in terms of energy and bandwidth while satisfying the QoS requirement of each flow with maximizing the network resources for future IIoT traffic flows. Comparative analysis of simulation results with shortest path delay, Lagrangian relaxation-based aggregated cost, and Sway schemes indicate a reduced violation in the service-level agreement by 17%, 19%, and 4%, respectively, by using the AttMpls topology, while it is 48%, 44%, and 7% when the Goodnet topology is used. Moreover, SEQOS is seen to be energy efficient and eight times faster than the benchmark algorithms in large IIoT networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2020.3006885

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reliance on centralized servers for data learning makes them vulnerable to security threats and poses a significant threat to patient safety and privacy.

    “Furthermore, the reliance on centralized servers for data learning makes them vulnerable and exposed to various types of security threats and thus, poses a significant threat to patient's safety and privacy [4].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naeem, F., Tariq, M., & Poor, H. V.
Affiliations
  • National University of Computer and Emerging Sciences (PK)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2021-08
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
5660-5667
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W3039292752
Cited by
83
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (CCF-0939370)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Optical Network Technologies
Keywords
software-defined networking, Industrial Internet of Things, energy-efficient routing, quality of service, greedy algorithm, delay-sensitive traffic, service level agreements, network resource allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review