Cited by 205Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityAccess Control and TrustCryptography and Data Security

A Blockchain-Based Auditable Access Control System for Private Data in Service-Centric IoT Environments

Han, Dezhi, Zhu, Yujie, Li, Dun, Liang, Wei, Souri, Alireza, Li, Kuan-Ching·2022·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) devices are widely considered in smart cities, intelligent medicine, and intelligent transportation, among other fields that facilitate people's lives, producing a large amount of private data. However, due to the mobility, limited performance, and distributed deployment of IoT, traditional access control methods cannot support the security of private data's access control process in current IoT environments. To address such problems, this article proposes an auditable access control model, based on an attribute-based access control model, and manages the access control policy for private data through the request record, the response record, and the access record stored in the blockchain network. Additionally, a Blockchain-based auditable access control system is also proposed based on the auditable access control model, ensuring private data security in IoT environments and realizing effective management and auditable access to these data. Experimental results show that the proposed system can maintain high throughput while ensuring private data security for real application scenarios in IoT environments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2021.3114621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some researchers store data under the chain and only the hash pointing to the data on the blockchain because the efficiency and performance of storing data on the blockchain are not good.

    “In addition, some researchers believe that the efficiency and performance of using the blockchain to store data are not good, so the data are stored under the chain, and only the hash pointing to the data is stored on the blockchain [84].”
  • Reference [84] stored access control policies in the blockchain and personal sensitive data under the chain, managing the data under the chain through the access control policies on the blockchain.

    “reference [84] stored access control policies in the blockchain and personal sensitive data under the chain and managed the data under the chain through the access control policies on the blockchain.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Han, D., Zhu, Y., Li, D., Liang, W., Souri, A., & Li, K.-C.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
  • Hunan University (CN)
  • Haliç University (TR)
  • Providence University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2022-05
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
3530-3540
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W3204421027
Cited by
205
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 3
FWCI
30.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61873160, 61672338)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1426500)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
blockchain, attribute-based access control, Internet of Things security, private data protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review