Cited by 47Wireless Communication Security TechniquesQuantum Information and CryptographySmart Grid Security and Resilience

A Counter-Eavesdropping Technique for Optimized Privacy of Wireless Industrial IoT Communications

Open access
Anajemba, Joseph Henry, Iwendi, Celestine, Razzak, Imran, Ansere, James Adu, Okpalaoguchi, Izuchukwu Michael·2022·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

The industrial Internet of Things (IIoTs) is a key component of the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) which is faced with privacy issues as the scale and sensitivity of user and system data constantly increases. Eavesdropping attack is one of such privacy issue of the IIoT system especially when the number of transmitting antennas is increased. Thus, the focus of this article is on establishing efficient privacy in an IIoT-multiple-input–multiple-output–multiple-antenna eavesdropping communications scenario. To achieve this, a closed-form derivation for asymptotic regularized prompt privacy rate is first formulated for IIoT network system. Then, the study further examines the design of optimal jamming parameters by proposing a model referred as optimal counter-eavesdropping channel approximation technique for tackling eavesdropping attack in IIoT. The simulated performance of the proposed model clearly shows that provided that the channel coherence time is less than two times the number of transmitting nodes, a high privacy precision is achieved even without deploying any artificial noise.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2021.3140109

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anajemba, J. H., Iwendi, C., Razzak, I., Ansere, J. A., & Okpalaoguchi, I. M.
Affiliations
  • Department of ML and AI, Wuhan Bofa Technology Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
  • University of Greater Manchester (GB)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Sunyani Technical University (GH)
  • CIO Logistics, Kearny, NJ, USA
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2022-09
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
6445-6454
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W4206822447
Cited by
47
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Communication Security Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Keywords
eavesdropping, multiple-antenna communication, artificial noise, privacy-utility trade-off, channel coherence time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review