Aero: Automotive ethernet real-time observer for anomaly detection in in-vehicle networks
Abstract
Automotive Ethernet enables high-bandwidth in-vehicle networking, facilitating the transmission of sensor data among electronic control units. However, the increasing connectivity and potential vulnerability inheritance in connected and autonomous vehicles expose them to security risks. To address this challenge, an intrusion detection system (IDS) capable of analyzing automotive Ethernet traffic and detecting anomalies is essential. In thisarticle, we propose automotive Ethernet real-time observer (AERO), an unsupervised network IDS designed to protect in-vehicle networks. AERO consists of three components: a feature extractor that constructs three multimodal features, a neural network for processing the extracted features, and an online anomaly detector that calculates outlier scores in real time. We evaluate the performance of AERO using the TOW-IDS automotive Ethernet intrusion dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that AERO achieves high detection performance across five different attack types and is highly applicable to automotive-grade devices for real-time anomaly detection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jeong et al. [42] proposed AERO, an unsupervised anomaly detection framework for in-vehicle Automotive Ethernet traffic that simultaneously captures protocol order, payload, and timing intervals, using the TOW-IDS automotive Ethernet intrusion dataset.
“Using the TOW-IDS automotive Ethernet intrusion dataset, Jeong et al. [42] proposed AERO, an unsupervised anomaly detection framework for in-vehicle Automotive Ethernet traffic that simultaneously captures protocol order, payload, and timing intervals.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
AERO successfully detected AVTP frame injection, PTP desynchronization, and CAN DoS/Replay attacks while enabling near-real-time operation on embedded Jetson-class devices.
“With thresholding derived solely from normal segments, AERO successfully detected AVTP frame injection, PTP desynchronization, and CAN DoS/Replay attackscapturing subtle distortions in protocol, content, and timing patterns-while enabling near-real-time operation on embedded Jetson-class devices.”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
The dataset distribution for time-series dependency-based techniques reveals a concentration on a limited set of benchmarks, with CIC-IDS2017, UNSW-NB15, IoT-23, LITNET-2020, NetML-2020, CIC-DDoS2019, and N-BaIoT widely used, especially for botnet, DDoS, and generic network intrusions, while only a subset of studies leverage ICS/CPS-specific traces such as Alstom TCMS traffic, multi-domain ICS-CPS
“Fourth, the dataset distribution again reveals a concentration on a limited set of benchmarks. CIC-IDS2017, UNSW-NB15, IoT-23, LITNET-2020, NetML-2020, CIC-DDoS2019, and N-BaIoT are widely used to evaluate time-series dependency-based techniques, especially for botnet, DDoS, and generic network intrusions [35,38,40,43]. Only a subset of studies leverage ICS/CPS-specific traces such as Alstom TCMS”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Deep sequence models (LSTM, BLSTM-GRU, CNN + Bi-GRU) and generative architectures (FID-GAN, VAE-based digital twins) are able to exploit complex temporal patterns and achieve strong detection or classification performance on benchmark datasets.
“Third, in terms of model behavior and failure modes, the surveyed work shows that deep sequence models (LSTM, BLSTM-GRU, CNN + Bi-GRU) and generative architectures (FID-GAN, VAE-based digital twins) are able to exploit complex temporal patterns and achieve strong detection or classification performance on benchmark datasets [35,38-40,42,44,45].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Unsupervised and generative approaches such as FID-GAN and autoencoder-based frameworks target zero-day or previously unseen attacks by learning normal temporal patterns and flagging deviations via reconstruction- or residual-based scores.
“Unsupervised and generative approaches such as FID-GAN and autoencoder-based frameworks target zero-day or previously unseen attacks by learning normal temporal patterns and flagging deviations via reconstruction- or residual-based scores [38,42,44].”
From AI-Based Anomaly Detection in Industrial Control and Cyber–Physical Systems: A Data-Type-Oriented Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
A survey of network-based intrusion detection data sets
Ring, M., Wunderlich, S., Scheuring, D., Landes, D., & Andreas Hotho, A. (2019) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.06.005 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Learning Deep Features for One-Class Classification
Perera, P., & Patel, V. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2019.2917862 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
A Survey of Intrusion Detection for In-Vehicle Networks
Wu, W., Li, R., Xie, G., An, J., Bai, Y., Zhou, J., & Li, K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2908074 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Network Anomaly Detection Using LSTM Based Autoencoder
Elsayed, M. S., Le‐Khac, N., Dev, S., & Jurcut, A. D. (2020) · ACM Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks (Q2SWinet) · doi:10.1145/3416013.3426457 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Analysis of KDD Dataset Attributes - Class wise for Intrusion Detection
Aggarwal, P., & Sharma, S. K. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.490 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Comparative research on network intrusion detection methods based on machine learning
Zhang, C., Jia, D., Wang, L., Wang, W., Liu, F., & Yang, A. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102861 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
In-Vehicle Networks Outlook: Achievements and Challenges
Zeng, W., Khalid, M. A. S., & Chowdhury, S. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2521642 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
A Survey of Attacks on Controller Area Networks and Corresponding Countermeasures
Jo, H. J., & Choi, W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3078740 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Towards Robust Decision-Making for Autonomous Driving on Highway
Yang, K., Tang, X., Qiu, S., Jin, S., Wei, Z., & Wang, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3268500 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
CANnolo: An Anomaly Detection System Based on LSTM Autoencoders for Controller Area Network
Longari, S., Valcarcel, D. H. N., Zago, M., Carminati, M., & Zanero, S. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2020.3038991 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Machine Learning-Based Detection for Cyber Security Attacks on Connected and Autonomous Vehicles
He, Q., Meng, X., Qu, R., & Xi, R. (2020) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math8081311 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Jeong, S. H., Jeon, B.-S., Chung, B., & Kim, H. K. (2021) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2021.100338 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationTOW-IDS: Intrusion detection system based on three overlapped wavelets for automotive ethernet
Han, M. L., Kwak, B. I., & Kim, H. K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3221893 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationNetwork intrusion detection system: A survey on artificial intelligence‐based techniques
Habeeb, M. S., & Babu, T. R. (2022) · Expert Systems · doi:10.1111/exsy.13066 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
An Extension to the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) to Enable the Detection of Cyber Attacks
Moussa, B., Kassouf, M., Hadjidj, R., Debbabi, M., & Assi, C. M. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2943913 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Unsupervised Network Intrusion Detection System for AVTP in Automotive Ethernet Networks
Alkhatib, N., Mushtaq, M., Ghauch, H., & Danger, J. (2022) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/iv51971.2022.9827285 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Alkhatib, N., Danger, J., & Ghauch, H. (2021) · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · Cited by 33 · see citing works
A General Approach for Traffic Classification in Wireless Networks Using Deep Learning
Camelo, M., Soto, P., & Latré, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2021.3130382 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
A Deep One-Class Intrusion Detection Scheme in Software-Defined Industrial Networks
Hu, B., Bi, Y., Zhi, M., Zhang, K., Yan, F., Zhang, Q., & Liu, Z. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2021.3133300 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
A Feature-Aware Semi-Supervised Learning Approach for Automotive Ethernet
Shibly, K. H., Hossain, M. D., Inoue, H., Taenaka, Y., & Kadobayashi, Y. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) · doi:10.1109/csr57506.2023.10224976 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DGIDS: Dynamic graph-based intrusion detection system for CAN
Song, J., Qin, G., Liang, Y., Yan, J., & Sun, M. (2024) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2024.104076 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Multi-stage deep learning-based intrusion detection system for automotive Ethernet networks
da Luz, L. F. M., de Araujo-Filho, P. F., & Campelo, D. R. D. S. (2024) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103548 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Li, S., Cao, Y., Peng, G., Li, M., Sun, W., & Chen, L. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3581117 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
GenCoder: A Generative AI-Based Adaptive Intra-Vehicle Intrusion Detection System
Smolin, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3476177 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Seo, J. K., Lee, J., Kim, B., Shim, W., & Seo, J. T. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15010020 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
In-vehicle communication cyber security: A comprehensive review of challenges and solutions
Gül, B., & Ertam, F. (2024) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2024.100846 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
GRID: Graph-Based Robust Intrusion Detection Solution for Industrial IoT Networks
Kong, X., Song, Z., Ye, X., Jiao, J., Qi, H., & Liu, X. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3560300 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Intrusion Detection and Prevention for Intra- and Inter-Vehicle Networks: A Comprehensive Survey
El-Fatyany, A., Mahmood, J., Berwo, M. A., Wang, X., Lu, L., Xue, Q., & Ren, K. (2026) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2026.3674515 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
StatGraph: Effective In-Vehicle Intrusion Detection via Multi-View Statistical Graph Learning
Wang, K., Jiang, Q., Wang, B., Wu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3636517 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Leveraging Semi-supervised Learning for Enhancing Anomaly-based IDS in Automotive Ethernet
Liu, J., Fan, W., Dai, Y., Lim, E., Pan, Z., & Lisitsa, A. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00216 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Fu, X., Si, H., Wang, W., & Xue, L. (2025) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104340 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Driveshield: Unmasking stealthy attacks on CAN bus via adversarial spatiotemporal feature learning
Jia, H., Xiong, X., Luo, H., & Cao, Y. (2025) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-025-00273-2 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Enhancing ECU identification security in CAN networks using distortion modeling and neural networks
Hafeez, A., Malik, H. M. A., Irtaza, A., Uddin, M. Z., & Noori, F. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2024.1392119 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tan, L., Chen, L., Wang, Y., Song, Z., & Lu, Z. (2026) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2026.075959 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
XGBoost-Based Anomaly Detection Framework for SOME/IP in In-Vehicle Networks
Kim, T., Park, H., You, I., & Kwak, B. I. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14020196 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationSmolin, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3595879 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Study of In-Vehicle Ethernet Message Scheduling Based on the Adaptive Frame Segmentation Algorithm
Chen, J., Wu, Y., Xu, Y., Zhang, K., & Xu, Y. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25082522 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Shang, W., Jin, S., & Han, W. (2026) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2026.112394 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
CarDS - Controller Area Network and Automotive Ethernet Realistic Data Set
Hellemans, W., Hamborg, J., Lauser, T., Rabbani, M. M., Bart Preneel, A., Krauß, C., & Mentens, N. (2025) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/acsac67867.2025.00069 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A Hybrid Approach to Universal Intrusion Detection Systems for Automotive Security
Islam, M. R., Sahlabadi, M., Batzorig, M., & Yim, K. (2026) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s26051489 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Can social media shape the security of next-generation connected vehicles?
Scarano, N., Mannella, L., Savino, A., Carlo, S. D., & Torino, P. D. (2024) · IEEE International On-Line Testing Symposium (IOLTS) · doi:10.1109/iolts60994.2024.10616053 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., & Xiu, J. (2025) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104263 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
SeqWatch: Unsupervised Sequence-based Intrusion Detection System for Automotive Ethernet
Leandro, M. S. G. A., de Araujo-Filho, P. F., Campelo, D. R. D. S., & da Luz, L. F. M. (2025) · doi:10.5753/sbrc.2025.5949
da Luz, L. F. M., de Araujo-Filho, P. F., & Campelo, D. R. D. S. (2025) · Simpósio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadores e Sistemas Distribuídos (SBRC) · doi:10.5753/sbrc_estendido.2025.6908
A Real-Time Temporal Deep Learning Framework for Anomaly Detection in Autonomous Vehicles
Hameed, R., Nagarathna, P., Kulkarni, B., Kumar, S. S., & Polisetty, S. P. R. S. (2025) · International Conference on Networks, Multimedia and Information Technology (NMITCON) · doi:10.1109/nmitcon65824.2025.11187534
Assessing LLMs models’ knowledge of automotive cyberthreats benchmarking autoISAC framework
Scarano, N., Mannella, L., Savino, A., & Carlo, S. D. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3736130.3762690
Leveraging Quantum Neural Networks for Next-Generation 7G-Based Autonomous Vehicle Connectivity
Rao, N. V. K., Pagidimalla, P., Karipe, S. V., & Chikkudu, B. (2026) · Signals and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1683-4_12
Yin, Z., Wei, H., Yu, M., Sun, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2026.3706825
An ST-GAT-Based Intrusion Detection Method for in-Vehicle Networks
Zhang, P., Cheng, L., Li, X., Yuan, H., & Xu, N. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Electromechanical Automation (AIEA) · doi:10.1109/aiea70743.2026.11632471
Nondestructive sensing and failure diagnosis technologies for lithium-ion battery aging and safety
Chen, D., Shou, Z., Yang, X., Chen, S., & Lü, Y. (2026) · Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A · doi:10.1631/jzus.a2600100
Vanajakshi, J., Renuka, A., Kamath, V. P., & Adesh, N. D. (2026) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.101056
SCIMI: Semantic-Aware Collaborative Intrusion Detection for Multi-domain In-Vehicle Networks
Zhu, C., Wang, X., Smahi, A., Wu, K., Shen, Y., Jiang, Y., Singh, A. K., & Ren, K. (2026) · ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC) · doi:10.1145/3770743.3803979
- Authors
- Jeong, S., Kim, H. K., Han, M. L., & Kwak, B. I.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Cybersecurity and Privacy, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Korea University (KR)
- Hallym University (KR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 4651-4662
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W4388430742
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (RS-2021-KA162334)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport
- National Research Foundation of Korea
- Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (2022R1A4A1033600)
- Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea (IITP-2023-RS-2022-00164800)
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Planning and Evaluation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Artificial Immune Systems Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Network Packet Processing and Optimization
- Keywords
- automotive Ethernet, in-vehicle networks, intrusion detection, anomaly detection, unsupervised learning, multimodal feature extraction, outlier detection, connected and autonomous vehicles, network security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review