Cited by 21Microwave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesTerahertz technology and applicationsSpectroscopy and Laser Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Millimeter- and Submillimeter-Wave Dielectric Measurements of Household Powders Using Fourier Transform Spectroscopy

Khan, Usman A., Nguyen, Nicholas, Afsar, Mohammed N.·2008·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

This paper presents the first step in characterizing and detecting common household powders as hoax materials by investigating their broadband dielectric characteristics. Pesticide is also studied due to its similarities to anthrax. A modified two-beam polarizing interferometer and custom-made sample holders were utilized to obtain the refractive index (RFI), absorption coefficient, complex real and imaginary permittivity, and loss tangent of flour, dry milk, cornstarch, pesticide, baking soda, and talc as a continuous function of frequency in the range of 400–1200 GHz. Dispersive Fourier transform spectroscopy was employed to provide phase and amplitude information, leading to the accurate and direct acquisition of the complex RFI and complex dielectric permittivity spectra. It is the first time that such measurements were carried out over such an extended frequency range for common powders to reveal marked variation in absorption and RFI values for different powders. The powders exhibit high-absorption characteristics, and the RFI values lie between 2.4 and 3.4 in this spectral range. A unique resonance signature for talc was detected at 1135 GHz with an associated anomalous dispersion. Parameters such as grain size and orientation were analyzed for their effect on the dielectric properties of powders. Relationships between density, permittivity, and RFI are explored to provide the ability to extrapolate results for other densities. The RFI and the real part of the dielectric permittivity were found to be the most reliable for identification and detection purposes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2007.909601

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 1993, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
  2. 1993, International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khan, U. A., Nguyen, N., & Afsar, M. N.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2008
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
286-293
ISSN
0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988805500
Cited by
21
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
Keywords
submillimeter spectroscopy, anthrax detection, refractive index, complex permittivity, loss tangent, absorption coefficient, polarizing interferometer, flour, corn starch, milk powder, sodium bicarbonate, talc, pesticides, anomalous dispersion, grain size effects, density effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review