Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 749

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multifocus Image Fusion and Restoration With Sparse Representation

Bin Yang, Shutao Li·2010·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

To obtain an image with every object in focus, we always need to fuse images taken from the same view point with different focal settings. Multiresolution transforms, such as pyramid decomposition and wavelet, are usually used to solve this problem. In this paper, a sparse representation-based multifocus image fusion method is proposed. In the method, first, the source image is represented with sparse coefficients using an overcomplete dictionary. Second, the coefficients are combined with the choose-max fusion rule. Finally, the fused image is reconstructed from the combined sparse coefficients and the dictionary. Furthermore, the proposed fusion scheme can simultaneously resolve the image restoration and fusion problem by changing the approximate criterion in the sparse representation algorithm. The proposed method is compared with spatial gradient (SG)-, morphological wavelet transform (MWT)-, discrete wavelet transform (DWT)-, stationary wavelet transform (SWT)-, curvelet transform (CVT)-, and nonsubsampling contourlet transform (NSCT)-based methods on several pairs of multifocus images. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach performs better in both subjective and objective qualities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2009.2026612

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 749

Metadata

Authors
Yang, B., & Li, S.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2010-04
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
884-892
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W2168783614
Cited by
749
References
3
FWCI
14.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.