The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Data-Driven Approach With Uncertainty Quantification for Predicting Future Capacities and Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-ion Battery
Open accessAbstract
Predicting future capacities and remaining useful life (RUL) with uncertainty quantification is a key but challenging issue in the applications of battery health diagnosis and management. This article applies advanced machine-learning techniques to achieve effective future capacities and RUL prediction for lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries with reliable uncertainty management. To be specific, after using the empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method, the original battery capacity data is decomposed into some intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and a residual. Then, the long short-term memory (LSTM) submodel is applied to estimate the residual while the Gaussian process regression (GPR) submodel is utilized to fit the IMFs with the uncertainty level. Consequently, both the long-term dependence of capacity and uncertainty quantification caused by the capacity regenerations can be captured directly and simultaneously. Experimental aging data from different batteries are deployed to evaluate the performance of proposed LSTM+GPR model in comparison with the solo GPR, solo LSTM, GPR+EMD, and LSTM+EMD models. Illustrative results demonstrate the combined LSTM+GPR model outperforms other counterparts and is capable of achieving accurate results for both 1-step and multistep ahead capacity predictions. Even predicting the RUL at the early battery cycle stage, the proposed data-driven approach still presents good adaptability and reliable uncertainty quantification for battery health diagnosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
Zhang, Y., Xiong, R., He, H., & Pecht, M. G. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2018.2805189 · Cited by 1,326
Critical review of state of health estimation methods of Li-ion batteries for real applications
Berecibar, M., Gandiaga, I., Villarreal, I., Omar, N., Van Mierlo, J., & Van den Bossche, P. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.042 · Cited by 1,126 · cited 1×
“As one key function of the BHDS, a well-designed future capacities and RUL prediction strategy should not only predict the battery capacity variation but also report the uncertainty level of predicted values, further enabling EV users to make reasonable decisions to avoid unexpected failures and losses [2].”
BackgroundYang, D., Zhang, X., Pan, R., Wang, Y., & Chen, Z. (2018) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.03.015 · Cited by 765
Gaussian process regression for forecasting battery state of health
Richardson, R. R., Osborne, M. A., & Howey, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.004 · Cited by 732
An ensemble model for predicting the remaining useful performance of lithium-ion batteries
Xing, Y., Ma, E. W. M., Tsui, K.-L., & Pecht, M. (2013) · Microelectronics Reliability · doi:10.1016/j.microrel.2012.12.003 · Cited by 673
Wei, J., Dong, G., & Chen, Z. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2017.2782224 · Cited by 643 · cited 2×
“On the basis of battery historical cycling data, various intelligent techniques such as vector machine [9], [10], neural network [11],”
MethodA brief review on key technologies in the battery management system of electric vehicles
Liu, K., Li, K., Peng, Q., & Zhang, C. (2019) · Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11465-018-0516-8 · Cited by 635
Self-citationWu, J., Zhang, C., & Chen, Z. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.057 · Cited by 528
Cited by
Wang, Y., Tian, J., Sun, Z., Wang, L., Xu, R., Li, M., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110015 · Cited by 1,377
Ferreira, C., & Gonçalves, G. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.010 · Cited by 417
Hossain Lipu, M. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Ayob, A., Saad, M. H. M., Karim, T. F., & How, D. N. T. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124110 · Cited by 378
Ma, Y., Shan, C., Gao, J., & Chen, H. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123973 · Cited by 351
Battery Safety: Machine Learning-Based Prognostics
Zhao, J., Feng, X., Pang, Q., Fowler, M., Lian, Y., Ouyang, M., & Burke, A. F. (2024) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2023.101142 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, K., Shang, Y., Ouyang, Q., & Widanage, W. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3170-3180
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W3012264837
- Cited by
- 833
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 36.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Data-Driven Approach With Uncertainty Quantification for Predicting Future Capacities and Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-ion Battery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2020.2973876
- The paper
- Liu, K., Shang, Y., Ouyang, Q., & Widanage, W. D. (2021). A Data-Driven Approach With Uncertainty Quantification for Predicting Future Capacities and Remaining Useful Life of Lithium-ion Battery. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2020.2973876
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
