The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multisensor Feature Fusion for Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Sparse Autoencoder and Deep Belief Network
Abstract
To assess health conditions of rotating machinery efficiently, multiple accelerometers are mounted on different locations to acquire a variety of possible faults signals. The statistical features are extracted from these signals to identify the running status of a machine. However, the acquired vibration signals are different due to sensor's arrangement and environmental interference, which may lead to different diagnostic results. In order to improve the fault diagnosis reliability, a new multisensor data fusion technique is proposed. First, time-domain and frequency-domain features are extracted from the different sensor signals, and then these features are input into multiple two-layer sparse autoencoder (SAE) neural networks for feature fusion. Finally, fused feature vectors can be regarded as the machine health indicators, and be used to train deep belief network (DBN) for further classification. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed SAE-DBN scheme, the bearing fault experiments were conducted on a bearing test platform, and the vibration data sets under different running speeds were collected for algorithm validation. For comparison, different feature fusion methods were also applied to multisensor fusion in the experiments. Experimental results demonstrated that the proposed approach can effectively identify the machine running conditions and significantly outperform other fusion methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Cited by
Applications of machine learning to machine fault diagnosis: A review and roadmap
Lei, Y., Yang, B., Jiang, X., Jia, F., Li, N., & Nandi, A. K. (2020) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106587 · Cited by 2,997
Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 · Cited by 2,894
Self-citationA review on the application of deep learning in system health management
Khan, S., & Yairi, T. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024 · Cited by 1,133
A survey on deep learning based bearing fault diagnosis
Hoang, D.-T., & Kang, H.-J. (2019) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.078 · Cited by 866
Data-Driven Methods for Predictive Maintenance of Industrial Equipment: A Survey
Zhang, W., Yang, D., & Wang, H. (2019) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2905565 · Cited by 732
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., & Li, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1693-1702
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W2603304445
- Cited by
- 883
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multisensor Feature Fusion for Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Sparse Autoencoder and Deep Belief Network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2017.2669947
- The paper
- Chen, Z., & Li, W. (2017). Multisensor Feature Fusion for Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Sparse Autoencoder and Deep Belief Network. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2017.2669947
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.