Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Online Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Transfer Convolutional Neural Networks

Xu, Gaowei, Liu, Min, Jiang, Zhuofu, Shen, Weiming, Huang, Chenxi·2020·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) is crucial for stable, reliable, and safe operation of industrial equipment. In recent years, deep learning models have been widely used in data-driven FDD methods because of their automatic feature learning capability. In general, these models are trained on historical sensor data, and therefore, it is very difficult to meet the real-time requirement of online FDD applications. Since transfer learning can solve different but similar problems in the target domain efficiently and effectively with the knowledge learned from the source domain, this paper proposes an online fault diagnosis method based on a deep transfer convolutional neural network (TCNN) framework. The TCNN framework is made up of an online CNN based on LeNet-5 and several offline CNNs with a shallow structure. First, time-domain signal data are converted into images that contain abundant fault information and are suitable as the input of CNN. Then, the online CNN is constructed to automatically extract representative features from the converted images and classify faults. Finally, in order to improve the real-time performance of the online CNN, several offline CNNs are also constructed and pretrained on related data sets. By directly transferring the shallow layers of the trained offline CNNs to the online CNN, the online CNN can significantly improve the real-time performance and successfully address the issue of achieving the desired diagnostic accuracy within limited training time. The proposed method is validated on two bearing data sets and one pump data set, respectively. The prediction accuracy of the proposed method using three data sets are 99.88%, 99.13%, and 99.98%, respectively. The experimental results also indicate that the improvement of accuracy is 19.21% for the motor bearing case, 29.82% for the rolling mill bearing case, and 33.26% for the pump case during the early stage of learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2019.2902003

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Xu, G., Liu, M., Jiang, Z., Shen, W., & Huang, C.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2020-02
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
509-520
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W2922660557
Cited by
353
References
42
FWCI
25.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Online Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Transfer Convolutional Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2019.2902003
The paper
Xu, G., Liu, M., Jiang, Z., Shen, W., & Huang, C. (2020). Online Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Transfer Convolutional Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2019.2902003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.