Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,095

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A New Deep Transfer Learning Based on Sparse Auto-Encoder for Fault Diagnosis

Wen, Long, Gao, Liang, Li, Xinyu·2019·IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems

Abstract

Fault diagnosis plays an important role in modern industry. With the development of smart manufacturing, the data-driven fault diagnosis becomes hot. However, traditional methods have two shortcomings: 1) their performances depend on the good design of handcrafted features of data, but it is difficult to predesign these features and 2) they work well under a general assumption: the training data and testing data should be drawn from the same distribution, but this assumption fails in many engineering applications. Since deep learning (DL) can extract the hierarchical representation features of raw data, and transfer learning provides a good way to perform a learning task on the different but related distribution datasets, deep transfer learning (DTL) has been developed for fault diagnosis. In this paper, a new DTL method is proposed. It uses a three-layer sparse auto-encoder to extract the features of raw data, and applies the maximum mean discrepancy term to minimizing the discrepancy penalty between the features from training data and testing data. The proposed DTL is tested on the famous motor bearing dataset from the Case Western Reserve University. The results show a good improvement, and DTL achieves higher prediction accuracies on most experiments than DL. The prediction accuracy of DTL, which is as high as 99.82%, is better than the results of other algorithms, including deep belief network, sparse filter, artificial neural network, support vector machine and some other traditional methods. What is more, two additional analytical experiments are conducted. The results show that a good unlabeled third dataset may be helpful to DTL, and a good linear relationship between the final prediction accuracies and their standard deviations have been observed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tsmc.2017.2754287

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. ranzato, 2006, Efficient learning of sparse representations with an energy-based model, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 1137
  2. rifai, 2011, Contractive auto-encoders: Explicit invariance during feature extraction, Proc 28th Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML), 833
  3. bengio, 2012, Deep learning of representations for unsupervised and transfer learning, Proc ICML Workshop Unsupervised Transf Learn, 17
  4. 10.1007/s00521-016-2325-5 · DOI
  5. glorot, 2011, Domain adaptation for large-scale sentiment classification: A deep learning approach, Proc 28th Int Conf Mach Learn (ICML), 513
  6. 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2482970 · DOI
  7. vincent, 2010, Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion, J Mach Learn Res, 11, 3371
  8. 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2637279 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TIE.2016.2627020 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/SMC.2014.6974107 · DOI
  11. gretton, 2007, A kernel method for the two-sample-problem, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 513
  12. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.022 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.09.009 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/TIE.2015.2417501 · DOI · Paper page
  16. henley, 1984, Application of expert systems to fault diagnosis, Proc AIChE Annu Meeting
  17. 10.1109/TIE.2013.2261033 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.09.081 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1109/TII.2008.2008642 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/s40537-016-0043-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.10.010 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/TIE.2015.2417501 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1109/TNN.2010.2091281 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2388958 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1109/TII.2013.2243743 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2605159 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/TSMC.2016.2585566 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TCST.2009.2020863 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1088/0957-0233/26/11/115002 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.04.021 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.07.028 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.knosys.2015.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.10.025 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,095

Metadata

Authors
Wen, L., Gao, L., & Li, X.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems
Published
2019-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
136-144
ISSN
  • 2168-2216 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2232
OpenAlex
W2763583057
Cited by
1,095
References
4
FWCI
47.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51435009, 51775216, 51711530038)
  • 111 Project (B16019)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Deep Transfer Learning Based on Sparse Auto-Encoder for Fault Diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tsmc.2017.2754287
The paper
Wen, L., Gao, L., & Li, X. (2019). A New Deep Transfer Learning Based on Sparse Auto-Encoder for Fault Diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2017.2754287

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.