Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 378

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Motor Current Signal-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Information Fusion

Hoang, Duy Tang, Kang, Hee Jun·2020·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Bearing fault diagnosis has extensively exploited vibration signals (VSs) because of their rich information about bearing health conditions. However, this approach is expensive because the measurement of VSs requires external accelerometers. Moreover, in machine systems that are inaccessible or unable to be installed in external sensors, the VS-based approach is impracticable. Otherwise, motor current signals (CSs) are easily measured by the inverters that are the available components of those systems. Therefore, the motor CS-based bearing fault diagnosis approach has attracted considerable attention from researchers. However, the performance of this approach is still not good as the VS-based approach, especially in the case of fault diagnosis for external bearings (the bearings that are installed outside of the electric motors). Accordingly, this article proposes a motor CS-based fault diagnosis method utilizing deep learning and information fusion (IF), which can be applied to external bearings in rotary machine systems. The proposed method uses raw signals from multiple phases of the motor current as direct input, and the features are extracted from the CSs of each phase. Then, each feature set is classified separately by a convolutional neural network (CNN). To enhance the classification accuracy, a novel decision-level IF technique is introduced to fuse information from all of the utilized CNNs. The problem of decision-level IF is transformed into a simple pattern classification task, which can be solved effectively by familiar supervised learning algorithms. The effectiveness of the proposed fault diagnosis method is verified through experiments carried out with actual bearing fault signals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2019.2933119

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 378

Metadata

Authors
Hoang, D. T., & Kang, H. J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2020-06
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
3325-3333
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W2965625921
Cited by
378
References
1
FWCI
14.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Motor Current Signal-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Information Fusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2019.2933119
The paper
Hoang, D. T., & Kang, H. J. (2020). A Motor Current Signal-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Information Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2019.2933119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.