The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Motor Current Signal-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Information Fusion
Abstract
Bearing fault diagnosis has extensively exploited vibration signals (VSs) because of their rich information about bearing health conditions. However, this approach is expensive because the measurement of VSs requires external accelerometers. Moreover, in machine systems that are inaccessible or unable to be installed in external sensors, the VS-based approach is impracticable. Otherwise, motor current signals (CSs) are easily measured by the inverters that are the available components of those systems. Therefore, the motor CS-based bearing fault diagnosis approach has attracted considerable attention from researchers. However, the performance of this approach is still not good as the VS-based approach, especially in the case of fault diagnosis for external bearings (the bearings that are installed outside of the electric motors). Accordingly, this article proposes a motor CS-based fault diagnosis method utilizing deep learning and information fusion (IF), which can be applied to external bearings in rotary machine systems. The proposed method uses raw signals from multiple phases of the motor current as direct input, and the features are extracted from the CSs of each phase. Then, each feature set is classified separately by a convolutional neural network (CNN). To enhance the classification accuracy, a novel decision-level IF technique is introduced to fuse information from all of the utilized CNNs. The problem of decision-level IF is transformed into a simple pattern classification task, which can be solved effectively by familiar supervised learning algorithms. The effectiveness of the proposed fault diagnosis method is verified through experiments carried out with actual bearing fault signals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jing, L., Zhao, M., Li, P., & Xu, X. (2017) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.017 · Cited by 698
Cited by
CNN parameter design based on fault signal analysis and its application in bearing fault diagnosis
Ruan, D., Wang, J., Yan, J., & Gühmann, C. (2023) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2023.101877 · Cited by 435
Multi-Sensor data fusion in intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machines: A comprehensive review
Kibrete, F., Engida Woldemichael, D., & Shimels Gebremedhen, H. (2024) · Measurement · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2024.114658 · Cited by 270
Motor Fault Diagnostics Based on Current Signatures: A Review
Niu, G., Dong, X., & Chen, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3285999 · Cited by 269
Chen, Z., Liang, D., Jia, S., Yang, L., & Yang, S. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2023.3255249 · Cited by 72
Ewert, P., Orlowska-Kowalska, T., & Jankowska, K. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14030712 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoang, D. T., & Kang, H. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3325-3333
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W2965625921
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Motor Current Signal-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Information Fusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2019.2933119
- The paper
- Hoang, D. T., & Kang, H. J. (2020). A Motor Current Signal-Based Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using Deep Learning and Information Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2019.2933119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.