Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Domain Adversarial Graph Convolutional Network for Fault Diagnosis Under Variable Working Conditions

Li, Tianfu, Zhao, Zhibin, Sun, Chuang, Yan, Ruqiang, Chen, Xuefeng·2021·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA)-based methods have made great progress in mechanical fault diagnosis under variable working conditions. In UDA, three types of information, including class label, domain label, and data structure, are essential to bridging the labeled source domain and unlabeled target domain. However, most existing UDA-based methods use only the former two information and ignore the modeling of data structure, which make the information contained in the features extracted by the deep network incomplete. To tackle this issue, a domain adversarial graph convolutional network (DAGCN) is proposed to model the three types of information in a unified deep network and achieving UDA. The first two types of information are modeled by the classifier and the domain discriminator, respectively. In data structure modeling, a convolutional neural network (CNN) is first employed to exact features from input signals. After that, the CNN features are input to the proposed graph generation layer to construct instance graphs by mining the relationship of structural characteristics of samples. Then, the instance graphs are modeled by a graph convolutional network, and the maximum mean discrepancy metric is leveraged to estimate the structure discrepancy of instance graphs from different domains. Experimental results conducted on two case studies demonstrate that the proposed DAGCN can not only obtain the best performance among the comparison methods, but also can extract transferable features for domain adaptation. The code library is available at:https://github.com/HazeDT/DAGCN.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2021.3075016

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Metadata

Authors
Li, T., Zhao, Z., Sun, C., Yan, R., & Chen, X.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2021
Volume
70
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W3157123770
Cited by
280
References
43
FWCI
21.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Domain Adversarial Graph Convolutional Network for Fault Diagnosis Under Variable Working Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2021.3075016
The paper
Li, T., Zhao, Z., Sun, C., Yan, R., & Chen, X. (2021). Domain Adversarial Graph Convolutional Network for Fault Diagnosis Under Variable Working Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2021.3075016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.