Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Triplet-Graph Reasoning Network for Few-Shot Metal Generic Surface Defect Segmentation

Bao, Yanqi, Song, Kechen, Liu, Jie, Wang, Yanyan, Yan, Yunhui, Yu, Han, Li, Xingjie·2021·IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement

Abstract

Metal surface defect segmentation can play an important role in dealing with the issue of quality control during the production and manufacturing stages. There are still two major challenges in industrial applications. One is the case that the number of metal surface defect samples is severely insufficient, and the other is that the most existing algorithms can only be used for specific surface defects and it is difficult to generalize to other metal surfaces. In this work, a theory of few-shot metal generic surface defect segmentation is introduced to solve these challenges. Simultaneously, the Triplet-Graph Reasoning Network (TGRNet) and a novel dataset Surface Defects- 4iare proposed to achieve this theory. In our TGRNet, the surface defect triplet (including triplet encoder and trip loss) is proposed and is used to segment background and defect area, respectively. Through triplet, the few-shot metal surface defect segmentation problem is transformed into few-shot semantic segmentation problem of defect area and background area. For few-shot semantic segmentation, we propose a method of multi-graph reasoning to explore the similarity relationship between different images. And to improve segmentation performance in the industrial scene, an adaptive auxiliary prediction module is proposed. For Surface Defects- 4i, it includes multiple categories of metal surface defect images to verify the generalization performance of our TGRNet and adds the nonmetal categories (leather and tile) as extensions. Through extensive comparative experiments and ablation experiments, it is proved that our architecture can achieve state-of-the-art results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tim.2021.3083561

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Bao, Y., Song, K., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., Yu, H., & Li, X.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
Published
2021
Volume
70
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9662
OpenAlex
W3164289800
Cited by
319
References
7
FWCI
23.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Triplet-Graph Reasoning Network for Few-Shot Metal Generic Surface Defect Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tim.2021.3083561
The paper
Bao, Y., Song, K., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Yan, Y., Yu, H., & Li, X. (2021). Triplet-Graph Reasoning Network for Few-Shot Metal Generic Surface Defect Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2021.3083561

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.