Shallow Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors
Abstract
Due to rapid development of sensor technology, human activity recognition (HAR) using wearable inertial sensors has recently become a new research hotspot. Deep learning, especially convolutional neural network (CNN) that can automatically learn intricate activity features have gained a lot of attention in ubiquitous HAR task. Most existing CNNs process sensor input by extracting channel-wise features, and the information from each channel can be separately propagated in a hierarchical way from lower layers to higher layers. As a result, they typically overlook information exchange among channels within the same layer. In this article, we first propose a shallow CNN that considers cross-channel communication in HAR scenario, where all channels in the same layer have a comprehensive interaction to capture more discriminative features of sensor input. One channel can communicate with all other channels by graph neural network to remove redundant information accumulated among channels, which is more beneficial for deploying lightweight deep models. Extensive experiments are conducted on multiple benchmark HAR datasets, namely UCI-HAR, OPPORTUNITY, PAMAP2 and UniMib-SHAR, which indicates that the proposed method enables shallower CNNs to aggregate more useful information, and surpasses baseline deep networks and other competitive methods. The inference speed is evaluated via deploying the HAR systems on an embedded system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most existing deep learning-based HAR methods assume that training and test data are drawn from the same distribution, which limits their ability to generalize to unseen users.
“Most existing methods assume that the training and test data are drawn from the same distribution [4,5,6,7,8], which limits their ability to generalize to unseen users.”
From Towards User-Generalizable Wearable-Sensor-Based Human Activity Recognition: A Multi-Task Contrastive Learning Approach (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Huang, W., Zhang, L., Gao, W., Min, F., & He, J.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Normal University (CN)
- Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W3173506890
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation of China (61203237)
- Industry-Academia Cooperation Innovation Fund Projection of Jiangsu Province (BY2016001-02)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191371)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- human activity recognition, wearable inertial sensors, shallow convolutional neural network, cross-channel communication, graph neural networks, lightweight deep learning, embedded deployment, ubiquitous health monitoring
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review