A Novel Data-Driven-Based Anti-Disturbance Fault-Tolerant Control Method With Application to Franka-Panda Robot
Abstract
Sensor faults have always been an essential and challenging problem in data-driven fault-tolerant control (DDFTC). Nevertheless, few studies in DDFTC have simultaneously considered the FTC problem under disturbance. To address the issue with both measurement noise and sensor fault, an iterative learning-based fault-tolerant control (ILFTC) strategy is presented when dynamics are completely unknown. First, an improved data-based unscented Kalman filter (UKF) mechanism is designed for the FTC scheme, which enhances the feasibility of the data-driven approaches under measurement disturbance. Then, the adaptive estimation algorithm with a switching mechanism is designed to improve the flexibility of the controller. Furthermore, a data-driven fault detection method is constructed under the framework of a broad learning system (BLS), which improves the detection accuracy while avoiding the need for precise model parameters in designing the fault detection observer. Finally, simulations and an application to the Franka-Panda robot demonstrate the superiority of the presented algorithm. Compared with the existing DDFTC schemes, smaller tracking errors and superior data signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be obtained.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Passive fault-tolerant control's static nature limits its adaptability to unforeseen faults in dynamic scenarios such as underwater robotics.
“However, PFTC's static nature limits its adaptability to unforeseen faults, a drawback noted in dynamic scenarios like underwater robotics [25].”
From Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Cites
Chen, C. L. P., & Liu, Z. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2017.2716952 · Cited by 1,957 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Control in Cooperative Robotics: Advances in Resilience and Scalability
Urrea, C. (2025) · Actuators · doi:10.3390/act14040177 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“However, PFTC’s static nature limits its adaptability to unforeseen faults, a drawback noted in dynamic scenarios like underwater robotics [25].”
- Authors
- Dong, Z.-Y., Xinyi, Y., Wei, Y., Zhou, L., & Ou, L.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University of Technology (CN)
- College of Information Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0018-9456 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9662
- OpenAlex
- W4403722228
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Baima Lake Laboratory Joint Funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LBMHD24F030002)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62373329, 62203392)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Iterative Learning Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
- Keywords
- sensor faults, disturbance rejection, iterative learning control, unscented Kalman filter, adaptive estimation, switching mechanism, fault detection, broad learning system, unknown dynamics, measurement noise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review