The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group-Based Sparse Representation for Image Restoration
Open accessAbstract
Traditional patch-based sparse representation modeling of natural images usually suffer from two problems. First, it has to solve a large-scale optimization problem with high computational complexity in dictionary learning. Second, each patch is considered independently in dictionary learning and sparse coding, which ignores the relationship among patches, resulting in inaccurate sparse coding coefficients. In this paper, instead of using patch as the basic unit of sparse representation, we exploit the concept of group as the basic unit of sparse representation, which is composed of nonlocal patches with similar structures, and establish a novel sparse representation modeling of natural images, called group-based sparse representation (GSR). The proposed GSR is able to sparsely represent natural images in the domain of group, which enforces the intrinsic local sparsity and nonlocal self-similarity of images simultaneously in a unified framework. In addition, an effective self-adaptive dictionary learning method for each group with low complexity is designed, rather than dictionary learning from natural images. To make GSR tractable and robust, a split Bregman-based technique is developed to solve the proposed GSR-driven ℓ0 minimization problem for image restoration efficiently. Extensive experiments on image inpainting, image deblurring and image compressive sensing recovery manifest that the proposed GSR modeling outperforms many current state-of-the-art schemes in both peak signal-to-noise ratio and visual perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L. I., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 15,704
Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit
Tropp, J. A., & Gilbert, A. C. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2007.909108 · Cited by 9,653
$rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation
Aharon, M., Elad, M., & Bruckstein, A. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2006.881199 · Cited by 9,451
A Non-Local Algorithm for Image Denoising
Buades, A., Coll, B., & Morel, J.-M. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.38 · Cited by 7,616
Image Denoising Via Sparse and Redundant Representations Over Learned Dictionaries
Elad, M., & Aharon, M. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.881969 · Cited by 5,321
Image Super-Resolution Via Sparse Representation
Yang, J., Wright, J., Huang, T. S., & Ma, Y. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2010.2050625 · Cited by 5,217
Optimal approximations by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems
Mumford, D., & Shah, J. (1989) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.3160420503 · Cited by 5,208
FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment
Zhang, L., Zhang, L., Mou, X., & Zhang, D. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2109730 · Cited by 5,203
Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit
Chen, S. S., Donoho, D. L., & Saunders, M. A. (2001) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450037906x · Cited by 5,085
The Split Bregman Method for L1-Regularized Problems
Goldstein, T., & Osher, S. (2009) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/080725891 · Cited by 4,282
Cited by
ISTA-Net: Interpretable Optimization-Inspired Deep Network for Image Compressive Sensing
Zhang, J., & Ghanem, B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00196 · Cited by 1,309
Self-citationPlug-and-Play ADMM for Image Restoration: Fixed-Point Convergence and Applications
Chan, S. H., Wang, X., & Elgendy, O. A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2016.2629286 · Cited by 904
Rank Minimization for Snapshot Compressive Imaging
Liu, Y., Yuan, X., Suo, J., Brady, D. J., & Dai, Q. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2873587 · Cited by 466
Applications of Metaheuristics in Reservoir Computing Techniques: A Review
Bala, A., Ismail, I., Ibrahim, R., & Sait, S. M. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2873770 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J., Zhao, D., & Gao, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3336-3351
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2045737896
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 48.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group-Based Sparse Representation for Image Restoration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2014.2323127
- The paper
- Zhang, J., Zhao, D., & Gao, W. (2014). Group-Based Sparse Representation for Image Restoration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2014.2323127
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.