The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-View Learning With Incomplete Views
Abstract
One underlying assumption of the conventional multi-view learning algorithms is that all examples can be successfully observed on all the views. However, due to various failures or faults in collecting and pre-processing the data on different views, we are more likely to be faced with an incomplete-view setting, where an example could be missing its representation on one view (i.e., missing view) or could be only partially observed on that view (i.e., missing variables). Low-rank assumption used to be effective for recovering the random missing variables of features, but it is disabled by concentrated missing variables and has no effect on missing views. This paper suggests that the key to handling the incomplete-view problem is to exploit the connections between multiple views, enabling the incomplete views to be restored with the help of the complete views. We propose an effective algorithm to accomplish multi-view learning with incomplete views by assuming that different views are generated from a shared subspace. To handle the large-scale problem and obtain fast convergence, we investigate a successive over-relaxation method to solve the objective function. Convergence of the optimization technique is theoretically analyzed. The experimental results on toy data and real-world data sets suggest that studying the incomplete-view problem in multi-view learning is significant and that the proposed algorithm can effectively handle the incomplete views in different applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm
Bach, F. R., Lanckriet, G. R. G., & Jordan, M. I. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015424 · Cited by 1,453
Cited by
Late Fusion Incomplete Multi-View Clustering
Liu, X., Zhu, X., Li, M., Wang, L., Tang, C., Yin, J., Shen, D., Wang, H., & Gao, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2879108 · Cited by 363
RGB-D salient object detection: A survey
Zhou, T., Fan, D.-P., Cheng, M.-M., Shen, J., & Shao, L. (2021) · Computational Visual Media · doi:10.1007/s41095-020-0199-z · Cited by 331
Multiple Kernel k-means with Incomplete Kernels
Liu, X., Gao, W., Zhu, X., Li, M., Wang, L., Zhu, E., Liu, T., Kloft, M., Shen, D., & Yin, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2892416 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, C., Tao, D., & Xu, C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5812-5825
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W1937059634
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-View Learning With Incomplete Views. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2015.2490539
- The paper
- Xu, C., Tao, D., & Xu, C. (2015). Multi-View Learning With Incomplete Views. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2015.2490539
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.