Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiple Kernel k-means with Incomplete Kernels

Open access
Liu, Xinwang, Gao, Wen, Zhu, Xinzhong, Li, Miaomiao, Wang, Lei, Zhu, En, Liu, Tongliang, Kloft, Marius, Shen, Dinggang, Yin, Jianping·2019·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Multiple kernel clustering (MKC) algorithms optimally combine a group of pre-specified base kernel matrices to improve clustering performance. However, existing MKC algorithms cannot efficiently address the situation where some rows and columns of base kernel matrices are absent. This paper proposes two simple yet effective algorithms to address this issue. Different from existing approaches where incomplete kernel matrices are first imputed and a standard MKC algorithm is applied to the imputed kernel matrices, our first algorithm integrates imputation and clustering into a unified learning procedure. Specifically, we perform multiple kernel clustering directly with the presence of incomplete kernel matrices, which are treated as auxiliary variables to be jointly optimized. Our algorithm does not require that there be at least one complete base kernel matrix over all the samples. Also, it adaptively imputes incomplete kernel matrices and combines them to best serve clustering. Moreover, we further improve this algorithm by encouraging these incomplete kernel matrices to mutually complete each other. The three-step iterative algorithm is designed to solve the resultant optimization problems. After that, we theoretically study the generalization bound of the proposed algorithms. Extensive experiments are conducted on 13 benchmark data sets to compare the proposed algorithms with existing imputation-based methods. Our algorithms consistently achieve superior performance and the improvement becomes more significant with increasing missing ratio, verifying the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed joint imputation and clustering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2019.2892416

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Gao, W., Zhu, X., Li, M., Wang, L., Zhu, E., Liu, T., Kloft, M., Shen, D., & Yin, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2019
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2560185252
Cited by
300
References
26
FWCI
19.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Kernel k-means with Incomplete Kernels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2019.2892416
The paper
Liu, X., Gao, W., Zhu, X., Li, M., Wang, L., Zhu, E., Liu, T., Kloft, M., Shen, D., & Yin, J. (2019). Multiple Kernel k-means with Incomplete Kernels. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2019.2892416

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.