The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 13 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we propose a novel deep convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithm for solving ill-posed inverse problems. Regularized iterative algorithms have emerged as the standard approach to ill-posed inverse problems in the past few decades. These methods produce excellent results, but can be challenging to deploy in practice due to factors including the high computational cost of the forward and adjoint operators and the difficulty of hyperparameter selection. The starting point of this paper is the observation that unrolled iterative methods have the form of a CNN (filtering followed by pointwise nonlinearity) when the normal operator (H*H, where H* is the adjoint of the forward imaging operator, H) of the forward model is a convolution. Based on this observation, we propose using direct inversion followed by a CNN to solve normal-convolutional inverse problems. The direct inversion encapsulates the physical model of the system, but leads to artifacts when the problem is ill posed; the CNN combines multiresolution decomposition and residual learning in order to learn to remove these artifacts while preserving image structure. We demonstrate the performance of the proposed network in sparse-view reconstruction (down to 50 views) on parallel beam X-ray computed tomography in synthetic phantoms as well as in real experimental sinograms. The proposed network outperforms total variation-regularized iterative reconstruction for the more realistic phantoms and requires less than a second to reconstruct a 512 × 512 image on the GPU.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper proposes FBPConvNet, a deep CNN that takes a filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction as input and learns to remove artifacts for inverse problems whose normal operator is a convolution, demonstrated on sparse-view X-ray CT. It reports competitive or better SNR than TV-regularized iterative reconstruction on realistic synthetic and real CT datasets, with sub-second GPU reconstruction.
Key findings
- FBPConvNet outperformed TV-regularized iterative reconstruction on the biomedical synthetic dataset: at 143 views, SNR was 36.15 dB vs. 31.92 dB for TV; at 50 views, 28.83 dB vs. 25.20 dB.
- On the real experimental CT dataset, FBPConvNet also had higher SNR than TV: 11.34 dB vs. 8.25 dB at 145 views, and 8.85 dB vs. 7.25 dB at 14× subsampling (table lists 51 views).
- On the ellipsoidal synthetic dataset, TV outperformed FBPConvNet: 29.48 dB vs. 28.96 dB at 143 views, and 27.69 dB vs. 23.84 dB at 50 views; the paper attributes this to TV being optimal for piecewise-constant phantoms.
- Reconstruction speed was about 200 ms for FBP plus 200–300 ms for the CNN on GPU for a 512 × 512 image, versus around 7 minutes for iterative reconstruction; the abstract states less than one second total.
Methods
- Design: FBPConvNet applies discretized FBP to measurements, then a CNN based on U-net with multilevel decomposition, multichannel filtering, and residual learning via a skip connection; zero-padding is used and the final layer reduces 64 channels to a single output image. Training pairs low-view FBP images with full-view FBP images as input and output.
- Data: three datasets—ellipsoid synthetic (500 images, sinograms 729 × 1,000), biomedical synthetic (500 real in-vivo CT images from the Mayo Clinic Low-dose Grand Challenge, sinograms 729 × 1,000), and experimental real CT (377 sinograms from the TOMCAT beamline, each 1,493 × 721, from rat brain z-slices). Synthetic data used 475 training and 25 test images; real data used 327 training and 25 test images with a 25-slice gap. Subsampling was ×7 and ×20 for synthetic (143 and 50 views) and ×5 and ×14 for real (145 and 52 views).
- Analysis: SNR was the quantitative metric; FBP, TV-regularized iterative reconstruction [13], and FBPConvNet were compared. Training used MatConvNet, a Titan Black GPU, about 15 hours for 101 iterations, learning rate decreasing from 0.01 to 0.001, batch size 1, momentum 0.99, gradient clipping at 10⁻², and flip-flop augmentation. TV parameters were selected by golden-section search to optimize performance on the training set.
Limitations
- Stated: the method lacks transfer between datasets; a network trained on ×7 subsampled sinograms retained artifacts when applied to ×20 subsampled sinograms, and different dimensions or subsampling factors require retraining.
- Stated: the work focuses on X-ray CT; adapting to MRI or diffraction tomography is expected to be non-trivial experimentally, requiring large training sets and a high-quality iterative reconstruction for comparison, and complex-valued data would need a CNN architecture that correctly handles complex values.
- Evident/acknowledged: TV outperformed FBPConvNet on the ellipsoidal piecewise-constant phantom, which the paper says is reasonable because TV regularization should be optimal there; the paper also notes TV parameters were tuned on the training set rather than learned from data, and the correct way to learn such parameters remains open.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 13 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“requires less than a second to reconstruct a 512 × 512 image on the GPU.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: High-view FBP reconstructions can serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Figure 5, again, the sparse-view FBP contains line artifacts.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both the TV and FBPConvNet methods significantly reduce these artifacts, giving visually indistinguishable results.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This yields a noticeable increase in performance compared to the same network without the skip connection.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclear- Rests on an assumption: High-view FBP reconstructions can serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The proposed network outperforms total variation-regularized iterative reconstruction for the more realistic phantoms”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: High-view FBP reconstructions can serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average SNR on the testing set for the TV method is higher than that of the the FBPConvNet.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We demonstrate the performance of the proposed network in sparse-view reconstruction (down to 50 views) on parallel beam X-ray computed tomography in synthetic phantoms as well as in real experimental sinograms.”
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: A twenty times reduction in the number of views corresponds to a twenty times reduction in the radiation dose received by the patient.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Especially, reconstructed images from the proposed network represented well complex textures which are important to diagnosis.”
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: High-view FBP reconstructions can serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A version of Theorem 1 also holds in the discrete case; we sketch the result here.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the downsampling is increased to twenty times, Figure 4, the line artifacts in the sparse-view FBP reconstruction are even more pronounced.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 20
- Probably not a substantial claim. 8
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 50 views (x20) | 8.44 | 27.69 | 23.84 |”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the seven times downsampling case, Figure 3, the full-view FBP (ground truth) shows nearly artifact-free ellipsoids, while the sparseview FBP shows significant line artifacts (most visible in the background).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 143 views (x7) | 16.09 | 29.48 | 28.96 |”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both the TV and FBPConvNet reduce these artifacts, though the FBPConvNet retains some of the artifacts.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the forward model is normal-convolutional and when W is a convolution, the algorithm consists of iteratively filtering by I -(1 /L ) W ∗ H ∗ HW , adding a bias, (1 /L ) W ∗ H ∗ y , and applying a point-wise nonlinearity, S θ .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 50 views (x20) | 13.52 | 25.2 | 28.83 |”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In Fig. 7, we observe the same trend as for the biomedical dataset, where the TV method oversmooths and the FBPConvNet better preserves fine structures.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is much faster than the iterative reconstruction, which, in our case, requires around 7 minutes even after the regularization parameters have been selected.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, after training, the computation time of the proposed network per one image is under a second.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The conventional iterative algorithm with TV regularization outperformed the FBPConvNet in the ellipsoidal dataset, while the reverse was true for the biomedical and experimental datasets.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 145 views (x5) | 5.38 | 8.25 | 11.34 |”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 143 views (x7) 24.97 | | 31.92 36.15 | |”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both TV and the proposed method remove streaking artifacts satisfactorily; however, the TV reconstruction shows the cartoon-like artifacts that are typical of TV reconstructions.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 51 views (x14) | 3.29 | 7.25 | 8.85 |”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The computation time for the FBPConvNet was about 200 ms for the FBP and 200 ∼ 300 ms in GPU for the CNN for a 512 × 512 image.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, in the case of CT reconstruction, if the sinogram is used as input, the CNN must encode a change between polar and Cartesian coordinates, which is completely avoided when the FBP is used as input.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We use high-view FBP reconstructions for training, meaning that training is possible from real data (without oracle knowledge).”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: High-view FBP reconstructions can serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We clip the computed gradients to a fixed range to prevent the divergence of the cost function [27], [46].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] [27] J. Kim, J. K. Lee, and K. M. Lee, 'Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks,' in Proc. of IEEE Converence on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2016. - source
- Not checked yetcites [46] [46] R. Pascanu, T. Mikolov, and Y. Bengio, 'On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks.' ICML (3) , vol. 28, pp. 1310-1318, 2013. - source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“We use flip-flop data augmentation in both horizontal and vertical directions during the training phase to reduce overfitting [18].”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [18] [18] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, 'Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks,' in Advances in neural information processing systems , 2012, pp. 1097-1105. -
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Many other iterate methods for solving Eq. (5), including ADMM [40], FISTA [41], and SALSA [42], also rely on these basic building blocks.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [40] [40] S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein, 'Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers,' Found. Trends in Mach. Learn. , vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-122, 2011. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [41] [41] A. Beck and M. Teboulle, 'A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems,' SIAM journal on imaging sciences , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 183-202, 2009. - source
- Not checked yetcites [42] [42] M. V. Afonso, J. M. Bioucas-Dias, and M. A. Figueiredo, 'Fast image recovery using variable splitting and constrained optimization,' IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2345-2356, 2010. - source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of the biomedical dataset, the test data is chosen from a different subject than the training set.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we instead simply select the parameters that optimize performance on the training set (via a golden-section search).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The class trivially includes denoising and deconvolution, but also includes MRI [35], X-ray CT [13], [16], and diffraction tomography (DT).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [35] [35] K. P. Pruessmann, M. Weiger, M. B. Scheidegger, P. Boesiger et al. , 'SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI,' Magn. Reson. Med. , vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 952-962, 1999. -
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked yetcites [13] [13] M. T. McCann, M. Nilchian, M. Stampanoni, and M. Unser, 'Fast 3D reconstruction method for differential phase contrast X-ray CT,' Opt. Express , vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 14 564-14 581, Jun 2016. - source
- Not checked yetcites [16] [16] E. Y. Sidky and X. Pan, 'Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization,' Physics in medicine and biology , vol. 53, no. 17, p. 4777, 2008. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In practice, inverse problems related with imaging are often ill-posed, which prohibits the use of direct inversion because measurement noise causes serve perturbations in the solution.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] [2] A. Chambolle, 'An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications,' J. Math. imaging and vision , vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 89-97, 2004. - source
- Not checked yetcites [9] [9] R. Tibshirani, 'Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso,' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) , pp. 267-288, 1996. - source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This formulation does not admit a closed form solution, and, therefore, is typically solved iteratively.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is critical for our application because the filters corresponding to H ∗ H (and its inverse) may have noncompact support, e.g. in CT. Thus, a CNN with a small, fixed filter size may not be able to effectively invert H ∗ H .”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The test data are obtained from the last z-slices with the gap of 25 slices left between testing and training data.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This points to one advantage of the proposed method over iterative methods: the iterative methods must explicitly impose regularization, while the FBPConvNet effectively learns a regularizer from the data.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
High-view FBP reconstructions can serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
“We compute its FBP (standard high quality reconstruction) and take this as the ground truth.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A twenty times reduction in the number of views corresponds to a twenty times reduction in the radiation dose received by the patient.
“a twenty times reduction in the number of views corresponds to a twenty times reduction in the radiation dose received by the patient.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The training and test sets for the synthetic datasets are disjoint.
“In case of synthetic data, the total number of training images is 475. The number of test images is 25.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Their study showed that U-net could effectively produce noiseless CT images from the subsampled sinogram.”
From Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology (2018) · cites this paper as [54]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Experimental 14-fold case is reported as both 51 and 52 views
MinorThe data-preparation text says the 14-fold subsampling yields 52 views, but Table III labels that case as 51 views.
“For the real data, we subsampled by factors of 5 and 14 corresponding to 145 and 52 views.”
“| avg. SNR (dB) | 51 views (x14) | 3.29 | 7.25 | 8.85 |”
Experimental result is described as 20-fold rather than 14-fold downsampling
MinorThe discussion of Fig. 8 calls it a twenty-times downsampling case, whereas the experimental data-preparation text identifies the corresponding 52-view case as 14-fold downsampling.
“These trends also appears in twenty times downsampling case (x20) in Fig. 8.”
“For the real data, we subsampled by factors of 5 and 14 corresponding to 145 and 52 views.”
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · cited 2×
“We demonstrate the approach on low-view CT reconstruction, using filtered back projection (FBP) and a CNN that makes use of residual learning [29], [39] and multilevel learning [20].”
BackgroundMethodImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · cited 3×
“image in the horizontal and vertical directions during the training phase to reduce overfitting [16].”
BackgroundU-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404 · cited 7×
“A more recent trend is deep learning [15], which has arisen as a promising framework providing state-of-the-art performance for image classification [16], [17] and segmentation [18]–[20].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482 · cited 2×
“Adding regularization (e.g., total variation [2] or l 1 sparsity as in LASSO [9]) overcomes this problem.”
BackgroundImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380 · cited 1×
“A more recent trend is deep learning [15], which has arisen as a promising framework providing state-of-the-art performance for image classification [16], [17] and segmentation [18]–[20].”
BackgroundFully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation
Long, J., Shelhamer, E., & Darrell, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298965 · Cited by 38,834
Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object Detection and Semantic Segmentation
Girshick, R., Donahue, J., Darrell, T., & Malik, J. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.81 · Cited by 32,684 · cited 1×
“A more recent trend is deep learning [15], which has arisen as a promising framework providing state-of-the-art performance for image classification [16], [17] and segmentation [18]–[20].”
BackgroundNonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms
Rudin, L., Osher, S., & Fatemi, E. (1992) · Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(92)90242-f · Cited by 17,214 · cited 2×
“compressed sensing [7] and the related regularizers such as total variation [1], [2], [4], [8], robust and practical algorithms”
BackgroundBoyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Flagged first, then by citations
9 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- epperson, 2013, Creation of fully sampled mr data repository for compressed sensing of the knee, Proc SMRT Conf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Accelerated Multi-Modal MR Imaging with Transformers.Preprint
Feng, C.-M., Yan, Y., Chen, G., Fu, H., Xu, Y. D., & Shao, L. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 19
CT-SDM: A Sampling Diffusion Model for Sparse-View CT Reconstruction Across Various Sampling Rates
Yang, L., Huang, J., Yang, G., & Zhang, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2025.3541491 · Cited by 25
HIONet: Deep priors based deep unfolded network for phase retrieval
Yang, Y., Lian, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, D., & Zhang, H. (2022) · Digital Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103797 · Cited by 17
Al-Nabulsi, J., Turab, N. M., Owida, H. A., Al-Naami, B. O., Fazio, R. D., & Visconti, P. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23167193 · Cited by 17
Application of machine learning regression models to inverse eigenvalue problems
Pallikarakis, N., & Ntargaras, A. (2023) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2023.11.038 · Cited by 15
Image restoration based on transformed total variation and deep image prior
Huo, L., Chen, W., & Ge, H. (2024) · Applied Mathematical Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.apm.2024.02.026 · Cited by 15
Optimized Binary Neural Networks for Road Anomaly Detection: A TinyML Approach on Edge Devices
Wang, W., Ullah, A., Li, L., et al. (2024) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2024.051147 · Cited by 15
Efficient Bayesian inference using physics-informed invertible neural networks for inverse problems
Guan, X., Wang, X., Wu, H., et al. (2024) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad5f74 · Cited by 15
HFGN: High-Frequency residual Feature Guided Network for fast MRI reconstruction
Fang, F., Hu, L., Liu, J., Yi, Q., Zeng, T., & Zhang, G. (2024) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110801 · Cited by 16
C2RV: Cross-Regional and Cross-View Learning for Sparse-View CBCT Reconstruction
Lin, Y., Yang, J., Wang, H., Ding, X., Zhao, W., & Li, X. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01065 · Cited by 19
Deep neural network-based recognition of entities in Chinese online medical inquiry texts
Liu, X., Zhou, Y., & Wang, Z. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.022 · Cited by 16
Deep synthesis network for regularizing inverse problems
Obmann, D., Schwab, J., & Haltmeier, M. (2020) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/abc7cd · Cited by 15
Consolidated Dataset and Metrics for High-Dynamic-Range Image Quality
Mikhailiuk, A., Perez-Ortiz, M., Yue, D., Suen, W., & Mantiuk, R. (2021) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 14
Sui, B., Lv, J., Tong, X., Li, Y., & Wang, C. (2021) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.15213 · Cited by 15
Vision-based Hand Gesture Recognition for Human-Computer Interaction using MobileNetV2
Baumgartl, H., Sauter, D., Schenk, C., Atik, C., & Buettner, R. (2021) · IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) · doi:10.1109/compsac51774.2021.00249 · Cited by 17
Convex optimization algorithms in medical image reconstruction—in the age of AI
Xu, J., & Noo, F. (2021) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac3842 · Cited by 15
Noise Reduction in CT Using Learned Wavelet-Frame Shrinkage Networks
Zavala-Mondragón, L. A., Rongen, P. M. J., Bescós, J. O., de With, P. H. N., & van der Sommen, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3154011 · Cited by 16
Unsupervised knowledge-transfer for learned image reconstruction*
Barbano, R., Kereta, Ž., Hauptmann, A., Arridge, S., & Jin, B. (2022) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ac8a91 · Cited by 15
Deep learning-based image reconstruction for photonic integrated interferometric imaging
Zhang, Z., Li, H., Lv, G., Zhou, H., Feng, H., Xu, Z., Li, Q., Jiang, T., & Chen, Y. (2022) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.469582 · Cited by 15
Encoder–Decoder Architecture for 3D Seismic Inversion
Gelboim, M., Adler, A., Sun, Y., et al. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23010061 · Cited by 15
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Deep Learning
Geethanjali, N., Pushpalatha, V., Ramya, C., Sandhiya, L., & Subhashri, S. (2023) · Winter Summit on Smart Computing and Networks (WiSSCoN) · doi:10.1109/wisscon56857.2023.10133851 · Cited by 16
Approximate k-Space Models and Deep Learning for Fast Photoacoustic Reconstruction
Hauptmann, A., Cox, B., Lucka, F. F., et al. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00129-2_12 · Cited by 15
Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Ding, M., & Li, J. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19235302 · Cited by 15
Multi-scale Unrolled Deep Learning Framework for Accelerated Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Nakarmi, U., Cheng, J. Y., Rios, E. P., et al. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi45749.2020.9098684 · Cited by 15
On the use of deep learning for computational imaging
Barbastathis, G. (2020) · doi:10.1117/12.2571322 · Cited by 15
Fast Super-resolution 3D SAR Imaging Using an Unfolded Deep Network
Gao, J., Yu, Y., Li, S., et al. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Signal, Information and Data Processing (ICSIDP) · doi:10.1109/icsidp47821.2019.9173392 · Cited by 15
Takabe, S., & Wadayama, T. (2022) · IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics Communications and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1587/transfun.2021eap1139 · Cited by 16
MSDU-Net: A Multi-Scale Dilated U-Net for Blur Detection
Xiao, X., Yang, F., & Sadovnik, A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21051873 · Cited by 15
What do AI algorithms actually learn? - On false structures in deep learningPreprint
Thesing, L., Antun, V., & Hansen, A. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.01478 · Cited by 15
Improving Robustness of Deep-Learning-Based Image ReconstructionPreprint
Raj, A., Bresler, Y., & Li, B. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.11821 · Cited by 33
Learned convex regularizers for inverse problemsPreprint
Mukherjee, S., Dittmer, S., Shumaylov, Z., Lunz, S., Öktem, O., & Schönlieb, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.02839 · Cited by 48
Inverse problems on low-dimensional manifolds
Alberti, G. S., Arroyo, Á., & Santacesaria, M. (2022) · Nonlinearity · doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aca73d · Cited by 14
Oliver, S. M., Martynowych, D., Turner, M. J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings - International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.istfa2021p0096 · Cited by 14
Variational Autoencoder Inverse Mapper: An End-to-End Deep Learning Framework for Inverse Problems
Almaeen, M., Alanazi, Y., Sato, N., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn52387.2021.9534012 · Cited by 14
Information cryptography using cellular automata and digital image processing
Kumar, A., & Sharma, S. K. (2022) · Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography · doi:10.1080/09720529.2022.2072437 · Cited by 14
Learning low‐dose CT degradation from unpaired data with flow‐based model
Liu, X., Liang, X., Deng, L., Tan, S., & Xie, Y. (2022) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.15886 · Cited by 14
Qu, X., Ren, C., Yan, G., et al. (2022) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.05.033 · Cited by 14
Deep learning based liquid level extraction from video observations of gas–liquid flows
Olbrich, M., Riazy, L., Kretz, T., Leonard, T., van Putten, D. S., Bär, M., Oberleithner, K., & Schmelter, S. (2022) · International Journal of Multiphase Flow · doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2022.104247 · Cited by 16
Dual-Domain Self-supervised Learning and Model Adaption for Deep Compressive Imaging
Quan, Y., Qin, X., Pang, T., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20056-4_24 · Cited by 14
Fast Full-Wave Electromagnetic Forward Solver Based on Deep Conditional Convolutional Autoencoders
Zhang, H. H., Yao, H. M., Jiang, L. J., & Ng, M. K. (2022) · IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · doi:10.1109/lawp.2022.3224983 · Cited by 15
Attention-based dual-branch deep network for sparse-view computed tomography image reconstruction
Gao, X., Su, T., Zhang, Y., et al. (2023) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-22-609 · Cited by 14
Sinogram Inpainting with Generative Adversarial Networks and Shape Priors
Valat, E., Farrahi, K., & Blumensath, T. (2023) · Tomography · doi:10.3390/tomography9030094 · Cited by 14
Barmada, S., Barba, P. D., Fontana, N., Mognaschi, M. E., & Tucci, M. (2023) · IEEE journal on multiscale and multiphysics computational techniques · doi:10.1109/jmmct.2023.3304709 · Cited by 15
Learned Alternating Minimization Algorithm for Dual-Domain Sparse-View CT Reconstruction
Ding, C., Zhang, Q., Wang, G., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43999-5_17 · Cited by 15
A Deep Learning Strategy for Multipath Ghosts Filtering via Microwave Tomography
Esposito, G., Catapano, I., Ludeno, G., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3337893 · Cited by 14
Shi, B., Jiang, K., Zhang, S., et al. (2024) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad1b8e · Cited by 14
LIR-Net:Learnable Iterative Reconstruction Network for Fan Beam CT Sparse-View Reconstruction
Cheng, Y., Li, Q. X., Li, R., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging · doi:10.1109/tci.2024.3358673 · Cited by 14
Yao, H. M., Zhang, H. H., Jiang, L. J., & Ng, M. K. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.2024.3369683 · Cited by 16
Nonlocal Similarity Modeling and Deep CNN Gradient Prior for Super Resolution
Ren, C., He, X., & Pu, Y. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2018.2829766 · Cited by 14
Compressed Remote Sensing by Using Deep Learning
Mirrashid, A., & Beheshti, A. A. (2018) · International Symposium on Telecommunications · doi:10.1109/istel.2018.8661112 · Cited by 16
Sparse Anett For Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Learning
Obmann, D., Nguyen, L. V., Schwab, J., & Haltmeier, M. (2020) · doi:10.1109/isbiworkshops50223.2020.9153362 · Cited by 15
Adversarial Training for Solving Inverse Problems in Image Processing
Zou, Z., Shi, T., Shi, Z., & Ye, J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2021.3053398 · Cited by 15
Recurrent neural network reveals transparent objects through scattering media
Kang, I., Pang, S., Zhang, Q., Fang, N. X., & Barbastathis, G. (2021) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.412890 · Cited by 15
Domain knowledge augmentation of parallel MR image reconstruction using deep learning
Pawar, K., Egan, G. F., & Chen, Z. (2021) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101968 · Cited by 15
Hofmann, A., Klein, M., Rueter, D., et al. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22207925 · Cited by 14
On-the-Fly Machine Learning for Improving Image Resolution in Tomography
Hendriksen, A. A., Pelt, D. M., Palenstijn, W. J., Coban, S. B., & Batenburg, K. J. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9122445 · Cited by 14
First arrival traveltime tomography using supervised descent learning technique
Guo, R., Li, M., Yang, F., et al. (2019) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ab32f7 · Cited by 14
Wang, Y., Li, H., Huang, J., Su, C., Yang, B., & Qi, C. (2019) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03852 · Cited by 14
Image reconstruction based on compressed sensing for sparse-data endoscopic photoacoustic tomography
Zheng, S., & Yan, X. (2019) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103587 · Cited by 14
Learnable Multi-scale Fourier Interpolation for Sparse View CT Image Reconstruction
Ding, Q., Ji, H., Gao, H., & Zhang, X. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87231-1_28 · Cited by 14
Deep Algorithm Unrolling for Blind Image DeblurringPreprint
Li, Y., Tofighi, M., Geng, J., Monga, V., & Eldar, Y. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.03493 · Cited by 15
Bayesian Inference with Generative Adversarial Network PriorsPreprint
Patel, D. V., & Oberai, A. A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.09987 · Cited by 16
Medical Imaging Synthesis using Deep Learning and its Clinical Applications: A ReviewPreprint
Wang, T., Lei, Y., Fu, Y., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.10322 · Cited by 14
Artificial Intelligence in Computed Tomography Image Reconstruction: A Review of Recent Advances
Zhang, R., Szczykutowicz, T. P., & Toia, G. V. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/rct.0000000000001734 · Cited by 15
Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Model Based on PSO-CNN-LSTM
Lv, Q., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., et al. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18133346 · Cited by 13
Li, Z., Long, Y. Q., & Chun, I. Y. (2022) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.15817 · Cited by 13
Khodajou-Chokami, H., Hosseini, S. A., & Ay, M. R. (2022) · Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment · doi:10.1016/j.nima.2022.166428 · Cited by 13
Assertive Vision Using Deep Learning and LSTM
Bhadauria, S. S., Bisht, D., Poongodi, T., et al. (2022) · International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM) · doi:10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754057 · Cited by 13
Far-Field Approximation Learning Method for Millimeter-Wave Short-Range Imaging
Yin, T., Tan, K., & Chen, X. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.2023.3242424 · Cited by 14
Lu, B., Fu, L., Pan, Y., & Dong, Y. (2024) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102345 · Cited by 13
Algorithms in Tomography and Related Inverse Problems—A Review
Tassiopoulou, S., Κούκιου, Γ., & Anastassopoulos, V. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17020071 · Cited by 12
MiPhDUO: microwave imaging via physics-informed deep unrolled optimization
Zumbo, S., Mandija, S., Isernia, T., et al. (2024) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/1361-6420/ad2b99 · Cited by 13
PtychoDV: Vision Transformer-Based Deep Unrolling Network for Ptychographic Image Reconstruction
Gan, W., Zhai, Q., McCann, M. T., García–Cardona, C., Kamilov, U. S., & Wohlberg, B. E. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/ojsp.2024.3375276 · Cited by 13
Self-citationLearned Tensor Neural Network Texture Prior for Photon-Counting CT Reconstruction
Shi, Y., Gao, Y., Xu, Q., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2024.3402079 · Cited by 13
Deep Learning For Mri Reconstruction Using A Novel Projection Based Cascaded Network
Kocanaogullari, D., & Ekşioğlu, E. M. (2019) · Machine learning for signal processing ... · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2019.8918715 · Cited by 16
Liugang, G., Xie, K., Chunying, L., Lu, Z., Jianfeng, S., Lin, T., Ni, X., & Dai, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.01715 · Cited by 14
Deep learning tomographic reconstruction through hierarchical decomposition of domain transforms
Fu, L., & Man, B. D. (2022) · Visual Computing for Industry Biomedicine and Art · doi:10.1186/s42492-022-00127-y · Cited by 14
Exploiting volumetric wave correlation for enhanced depth imaging in scattering medium
Lee, Y.-R., Kim, D., Jo, Y., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37467-z · Cited by 13
Kang, Y., Liu, J., Wu, F., Wang, K., Qiang, J., Hu, D., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108010 · Cited by 13
A Novel Radiogenomics Framework for Genomic and Image Feature Correlation using Deep Learning
Li, S., Han, H., Sui, D., Hao, A., & Qin, H. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2018.8621432 · Cited by 13
Compressive Classification from Single Pixel Measurements Via Deep Learning
Bacca, J., Correa, C. V., Vargas, E., Castillo, S., & Argüello, H. (2019) · Machine learning for signal processing ... · doi:10.1109/mlsp.2019.8918920 · Cited by 15
Learning a Probabilistic Strategy for Computational Imaging Sensor Selection
Sun, H., Dalca, A. V., & Bouman, K. L. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Computational Photography (ICCP) · doi:10.1109/iccp48838.2020.9105133 · Cited by 13
Dual residual convolutional neural network (DRCNN) for low-dose CT imaging
Feng, Z., Cai, A., Wang, Y., Li, L., Tong, L., & Yan, B. (2021) · Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology · doi:10.3233/xst-200777 · Cited by 13
Unsupervised Image Restoration Using Partially Linear Denoisers
Ke, R., & Schönlieb, C. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3070382 · Cited by 13
Xiao, B., & Hu, Y. (2025) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2025.111956 · Cited by 12
Fang, Y., Yang, J., Ma, D., Yang, M., Xu, Z., & Chen, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnse.2025.3598575 · Cited by 13
Deformation-Compensated Learning for Image Reconstruction Without Ground Truth
Gan, W., Sun, Y., Eldeniz, C., Liu, J., An, H., & Kamilov, U. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3163018 · Cited by 12
Kim, S.-J., Kim, B., Lee, J., & Baek, J. (2023) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.16552 · Cited by 11
The Foundations of Computational Imaging: A signal processing perspective
Karl, W. C., Fowler, J. E., Bouman, C. A., et al. (2023) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2023.3274328 · Cited by 12
Zhao, X., Du, Y., Yue, H., Wang, R., Zhou, S., Wu, H., Wang, W., & Peng, Y. (2023) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-23-759 · Cited by 12
Proj2Proj: self-supervised low-dose CT reconstruction
Unal, M. O., Ertaş, M., & Yıldırım, İ. (2024) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1849 · Cited by 13
Yao, H. M., Jiang, L. J., & Ng, M. K. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2024.3369420 · Cited by 14
Image Reconstruction for Accelerated MR Scan With Faster Fourier Convolutional Neural Networks
Liu, X., Pang, Y., Sun, X., Liu, Y., Hou, Y., Wang, Z., & Li, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2024.3388970 · Cited by 15
He, J., Ma, H., Guo, M., Wang, J., Wang, Z., & Fan, G. (2024) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-24-67 · Cited by 13
An efficient dual-domain deep learning network for sparse-view CT reconstruction
Sun, C., Salimi, Y., Neroladaki, A., Boudabbous, S., & Zaidi, H. (2024) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108376 · Cited by 15
Zhang, X., Di, Y., Xiao, H., & Zhong, R. (2024) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-024-02532-4 · Cited by 14
Chen, S., Luo, C., Wang, H., et al. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18051342 · Cited by 12
Inverse synthetic aperture radar imaging using complex‐value deep neural network
Hu, C., Wang, L., Li, Z., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Engineering · doi:10.1049/joe.2019.0571 · Cited by 12
Augmented NETT regularization of inverse problems
Obmann, D., Nguyen, L. V., Schwab, J., & Haltmeier, M. (2021) · Journal of Physics Communications · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ac26aa · Cited by 13
Ma, G., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., Wang, T., & Li, H. (2021) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.15205 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Jin, K. H., McCann, M. T., Froustey, E., & Unser, M.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- Dassault Aviation (France) (FR)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4509-4522
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2574952845
- Semantic Scholar
- 8a68ca7c5ba4d92de3435961f88188d0b769b920
- Cited by
- 2,529
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 184 · 2025: 280 · 2024: 291 · 2023: 318 · 2022: 317 · 2021: 383 · 2020: 326 · 2019: 277 · 2018: 128 · 2017: 23
- FWCI
- 228.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council (the European Research Council under Grant 692726 ()
- Centre dImagerie BioMedicale
- EPFL Fellows fellowship program co-funded by Marie Curie from the EuropeanUnions Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (665667)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Keywords
- deep convolutional neural networks, ill-posed inverse problems, direct inversion, artifact removal, multiresolution decomposition, residual learning, sparse-view reconstruction, total variation regularization, image reconstruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
