Cited by 28Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingNumerical methods in inverse problems

Fast 3D reconstruction method for differential phase contrast X-ray CT

Open access
McCann, Michael T., Nilchian, Masih, Stampanoni, Marco, Unser, Michael·2016·Optics Express

Abstract

We present a fast algorithm for fully 3D regularized X-ray tomography reconstruction for both traditional and differential phase contrast measurements. In many applications, it is critical to reduce the X-ray dose while producing high-quality reconstructions. Regularization is an excellent way to do this, but in the differential phase contrast case it is usually applied in a slice-by-slice manner. We propose using fully 3D regularization to improve the dose/quality trade-off beyond what is possible using slice-by-slice regularization. To make this computationally feasible, we show that the two computational bottlenecks of our iterative optimization process can be expressed as discrete convolutions; the resulting algorithms for computation of the X-ray adjoint and normal operator are fast and simple alternatives to regridding. We validate this algorithm on an analytical phantom as well as conventional CT and differential phase contrast measurements from two real objects. Compared to the slice-by-slice approach, our algorithm provides a more accurate reconstruction of the analytical phantom and better qualitative appearance on one of the two real datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.24.014564

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The class of normal-convolutional inverse problems includes denoising, deconvolution, MRI, X-ray CT, and diffraction tomography.

    “The class trivially includes denoising and deconvolution, but also includes MRI [35], X-ray CT [13], [16], and diffraction tomography (DT).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCann, M. T., Nilchian, M., Stampanoni, M., & Unser, M.
Affiliations
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
  • Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
Corresponding author
McCann, Michael T.
Venue
Optics Express
Published
2016-06-20
Volume
24
Issue
13
Pages
14564
ISSN
1094-4087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2463302795
Cited by
28
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Optics Express (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Research Council (ERC) (267439 - FUN-SP)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
Keywords
differential phase contrast, X-ray tomography, iterative reconstruction, X-ray dose reduction, discrete convolution, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review