A Gabor Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Screen Content Images
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, an accurate and efficient full-reference image quality assessment (IQA) model using the extracted Gabor features, called Gabor feature-based model (GFM), is proposed for conducting objective evaluation of screen content images (SCIs). It is well-known that the Gabor filters are highly consistent with the response of the human visual system (HVS), and the HVS is highly sensitive to the edge information. Based on these facts, the imaginary part of the Gabor filter that has odd symmetry and yields edge detection is exploited to the luminance of the reference and distorted SCI for extracting their Gabor features, respectively. The local similarities of the extracted Gabor features and two chrominance components, recorded in the LMN color space, are then measured independently. Finally, the Gabor-feature pooling strategy is employed to combine these measurements and generate the final evaluation score. Experimental simulation results obtained from two large SCI databases have shown that the proposed GFM model not only yields a higher consistency with the human perception on the assessment of SCIs but also requires a lower computational complexity, compared with that of classical and state-of-the-art IQA models. The source code for the proposed GFM will be available at http://smartviplab.org/pubilcations/GFM.html.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gabor function should be chosen carefully because it significantly affects spatial localization, orientation selectivity and spatial frequency characterization.
“For the targeted task of surface defect detection for flat steels in this paper, Gabor function should be chosen carefully because it significantly affects spatial localization, orientation selectivity and spatial frequency characterization [60,61].”
From Automated Visual Defect Detection for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [61]
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892 · see citing works
Daugman, J. G. (1985) · Journal of the Optical Society of America A · doi:10.1364/josaa.2.001160 · Cited by 3,219 · see citing works
Jones, J. P., & Palmer, L. A. (1987) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1987.58.6.1233 · Cited by 1,658 · see citing works
RRED Indices: Reduced Reference Entropic Differencing for Image Quality Assessment
Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2011.2166082 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automated Visual Defect Detection for Flat Steel Surface: A Survey
Luo, Q., Fang, X., Liu, L., Yang, C., & Sun, Y. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2019.2963555 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Huang, Z., & Liu, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2020.3027001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ni, Z., Zeng, H., Ma, L., Hou, J., Chen, J., & Ma, K.-K.
- Affiliations
- Huaqiao University (CN)
- Tencent (China) (CN)
- City University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Nanyang Technological University (SG)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 4516-4528
- ISSN
- 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0042
- OpenAlex
- W2804922349
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61401167, 61372107, 61602191)
- Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2016J01308, 2017J05103)
- Fujian-100 Talented People Program
- High-level Talent Innovation Program of Quanzhou City (2017G027)
- Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University (ZQN-YX403, ZQN-PY418)
- High-Level Talent Project Foundation of Huaqiao University (14BS201, 14BS204, 16BS108)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- full-reference image quality assessment, Gabor features, screen content images, human visual system, edge detection, feature pooling, computational complexity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review