Cited by 118Image and Video Quality AssessmentImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesDigital Media Forensic Detection

A Gabor Feature-Based Quality Assessment Model for the Screen Content Images

Open access
Ni, Zhangkai, Zeng, Huanqiang, Ma, Lin, Hou, Junhui, Chen, Jing, Ma, Kai-Kuang·2018·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

In this paper, an accurate and efficient full-reference image quality assessment (IQA) model using the extracted Gabor features, called Gabor feature-based model (GFM), is proposed for conducting objective evaluation of screen content images (SCIs). It is well-known that the Gabor filters are highly consistent with the response of the human visual system (HVS), and the HVS is highly sensitive to the edge information. Based on these facts, the imaginary part of the Gabor filter that has odd symmetry and yields edge detection is exploited to the luminance of the reference and distorted SCI for extracting their Gabor features, respectively. The local similarities of the extracted Gabor features and two chrominance components, recorded in the LMN color space, are then measured independently. Finally, the Gabor-feature pooling strategy is employed to combine these measurements and generate the final evaluation score. Experimental simulation results obtained from two large SCI databases have shown that the proposed GFM model not only yields a higher consistency with the human perception on the assessment of SCIs but also requires a lower computational complexity, compared with that of classical and state-of-the-art IQA models. The source code for the proposed GFM will be available at http://smartviplab.org/pubilcations/GFM.html.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2018.2839890

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gabor function should be chosen carefully because it significantly affects spatial localization, orientation selectivity and spatial frequency characterization.

    “For the targeted task of surface defect detection for flat steels in this paper, Gabor function should be chosen carefully because it significantly affects spatial localization, orientation selectivity and spatial frequency characterization [60,61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ni, Z., Zeng, H., Ma, L., Hou, J., Chen, J., & Ma, K.-K.
Affiliations
  • Huaqiao University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2018-09
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
4516-4528
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W2804922349
Cited by
118
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61401167, 61372107, 61602191)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (2016J01308, 2017J05103)
  • Fujian-100 Talented People Program
  • High-level Talent Innovation Program of Quanzhou City (2017G027)
  • Promotion Program for Young and Middle-aged Teacher in Science and Technology Research of Huaqiao University (ZQN-YX403, ZQN-PY418)
  • High-Level Talent Project Foundation of Huaqiao University (14BS201, 14BS204, 16BS108)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
full-reference image quality assessment, Gabor features, screen content images, human visual system, edge detection, feature pooling, computational complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review