Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals

Min, Xiongkuo, Zhai, Guangtao, Zhou, Jiantao, Farias, Mylene C. Q., Bovik, Alan Conrad·2020·IEEE Transactions on Image Processing

Abstract

The topics of visual and audio quality assessment (QA) have been widely researched for decades, yet nearly all of this prior work has focused only on single-mode visual or audio signals. However, visual signals rarely are presented without accompanying audio, including heavy-bandwidth video streaming applications. Moreover, the distortions that may separately (or conjointly) afflict the visual and audio signals collectively shape user-perceived quality of experience (QoE). This motivated us to conduct a subjective study of audio and video (A/V) quality, which we then used to compare and develop A/V quality measurement models and algorithms. The new LIVE-SJTU Audio and Video Quality Assessment (A/V-QA) Database includes 336 A/V sequences that were generated from 14 original source contents by applying 24 different A/V distortion combinations on them. We then conducted a subjective A/V quality perception study on the database towards attaining a better understanding of how humans perceive the overall combined quality of A/V signals. We also designed four different families of objective A/V quality prediction models, using a multimodal fusion strategy. The different types of A/V quality models differ in both the unimodal audio and video quality prediction models comprising the direct signal measurements and in the way that the two perceptual signal modes are combined. The objective models are built using both existing state-of-the-art audio and video quality prediction models and some new prediction models, as well as quality-predictive features delivered by a deep neural network. The methods of fusing audio and video quality predictions that are considered include simple product combinations as well as learned mappings. Using the new subjective A/V database as a tool, we validated and tested all of the objective A/V quality prediction models. We will make the database publicly available to facilitate further research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tip.2020.2988148

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Min, X., Zhai, G., Zhou, J., Farias, M. C. Q., & Bovik, A. C.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
Published
2020
Volume
29
Pages
6054-6068
ISSN
  • 1057-7149 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0042
OpenAlex
W3019533076
Cited by
328
References
42
FWCI
12.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tip.2020.2988148
The paper
Min, X., Zhai, G., Zhou, J., Farias, M. C. Q., & Bovik, A. C. (2020). Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2020.2988148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.