The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers
Abstract
The overall mean recognition probability (mean accuracy) of a pattern classifier is calculated and numerically plotted as a function of the pattern measurement complexity n and design data set sizem. Utilized is the well-known probabilistic model of a two-class, discrete-measurement pattern environment (no Gaussian or statistical independence assumptions are made). The minimum-error recognition rule (Bayes) is used, with the unknown pattern environment probabilities estimated from the data relative frequencies. In calculating the mean accuracy over all such environments, only three parameters remain in the final equation:n, m, and the prior probabilityp_{c}of either of the pattern classes. With a fixed design pattern sample, recognition accuracy can first increase as the number of measurements made on a pattern increases, but decay with measurement complexity higher than some optimum value. Graphs of the mean accuracy exhibit both an optimal and a maximum acceptable value ofnfor fixedmandp_{c}. A four-place tabulation of the optimumnand maximum mean accuracy values is given for equally likely classes andmranging from2to1000. The penalty exacted for the generality of the analysis is the use of the mean accuracy itself as a recognizer optimality criterion. Namely, one necessarily always has some particular recognition problem at hand whose Bayes accuracy will be higher or lower than the mean over all recognition problems having fixedn, m, andp_{c}.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Machine learning with big data: challenges and approaches.
L'Heureux, A., Grolinger, K., Elyamany, H. F., & Capretz, M. A. M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2696365 · Cited by 1,023
Feature dimensionality reduction: a review
Jia, W., Sun, M., Lian, J., & Hou, S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00637-x · Cited by 797
Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification With Edge-Preserving Filtering
Kang, X., Li, S., & Benediktsson, J. A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2013.2264508 · Cited by 704
He, L., Li, J., Liu, C., & Li, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2765364 · Cited by 630
The Heterogeneity Problem: Approaches to Identify Psychiatric Subtypes
Feczko, E., Miranda-Dominguez, O., Marr, M., Graham, A. M., Nigg, J. T., & Fair, D. A. (2019) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.009 · Cited by 443
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
- Published
- 1968-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9654
- OpenAlex
- W2098057602
- Cited by
- 2,859
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.1968.1054102
- The paper
- Hughes, G. (1968). On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1968.1054102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.