Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,208

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.)

Bahl, L., Cocke, J., Jelinek, F., Raviv, J.·1974·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

The general problem of estimating the a posteriori probabilities of the states and transitions of a Markov source observed through a discrete memoryless channel is considered. The decoding of linear block and convolutional codes to minimize symbol error probability is shown to be a special case of this problem. An optimal decoding algorithm is derived.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.1974.1055186

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 5,208

Metadata

Authors
Bahl, L., Cocke, J., Jelinek, F., & Raviv, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
1974-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
284-287
ISSN
  • 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9654
OpenAlex
W2045407304
Cited by
5,208
References
0
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tit.1974.1055186
The paper
Bahl, L., Cocke, J., Jelinek, F., & Raviv, J. (1974). Optimal decoding of linear codes for minimizing symbol error rate (Corresp.). IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1974.1055186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.