Cited by 5,456Algorithms and Data CompressionAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesError Correcting Code Techniques

A universal algorithm for sequential data compression

Ziv, J., Lempel, A.·1977·IEEE Transactions on Information Theory

Abstract

A universal algorithm for sequential data compression is presented. Its performance is investigated with respect to a nonprobabilistic model of constrained sources. The compression ratio achieved by the proposed universal code uniformly approaches the lower bounds on the compression ratios attainable by block-to-variable codes and variable-to-block codes designed to match a completely specified source.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tit.1977.1055714

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziv, J., & Lempel, A.
Affiliations
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
Published
1977-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
337-343
ISSN
  • 0018-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9654
OpenAlex
W2107745473
Cited by
5,456
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 131 · 2025: 163 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 167 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 171 · 2020: 189 · 2019: 194 · 2018: 196 · 2017: 238 · 2016: 200 · 2015: 230 · 2014: 217 · 2013: 217 · 2012: 218
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Error Correcting Code Techniques
Keywords
universal compression, universal coding, source matching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review